...
首页> 外文期刊>World trade review >WTO legality of discriminatory liberalization of internal regulations: role of RTA national treatment
【24h】

WTO legality of discriminatory liberalization of internal regulations: role of RTA national treatment

机译:WTO歧视性开放内部法规的合法性:RTA国民待遇的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, we study the interaction between regionalism and multilateralism by examining the role of national treatment clauses in regional trade agreements (RTAs). We ask whether discriminatory liberalization of internal regulations under RTAs can fulfill the requirements of the GATT Article XXIV defense. In the presence of pre-existing RTAs with RTA national treatment clauses, the GATT Article XXIV defenses for violations of GATT Article I and GATT Article III resulting from preferential liberalization of internal regulations may not succeed because the ' necessity' requirement under the Turkey-Textiles Appellate Body test is not likely to be met. The necessity requirement would fail because the RTA party may adopt' a reasonable alternative' of applying the measure non-discriminatorily to all WTO members. RTA national treatment clauses in the pre-existing RTAs may have the effect of binding the RTA parties to liberalize trade-restrictive internal regulations on a non-discriminatory basis.
机译:在本文中,我们通过研究国民待遇条款在区域贸易协定(RTA)中的作用,研究了区域主义与多边主义之间的相互作用。我们问,在区域贸易协定下歧视性地放宽内部法规是否可以满足关贸总协定第二十四条辩护的要求。在存在带有RTA国民待遇条款的RTAs的情况下,GATT第XXIV条针对因优惠的内部法规自由化而违反GATT I和GATT III的行为的辩护可能不会成功,因为土耳其纺织品的“必要性”要求上诉人身体测试不太可能达到。必要性要求将失败,因为RTA缔约方可能会采取“合理的选择”,对所有WTO成员非歧视地采取该措施。先前存在的区域贸易协定中的RTA国民待遇条款可能具有约束RTA各方在非歧视性基础上放宽贸易限制性内部法规的效果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《World trade review 》 |2011年第4期| p.473-495| 共23页
  • 作者

    JONG BUM KIM;

  • 作者单位

    Graduate School of International Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号