首页> 外文期刊>World trade review >Article 21.5 DSU Appellate Body Report United States - Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint): Spillovers from Defense R&D Add to the Tug-of-War between Panels and the WTO Appellate Body
【24h】

Article 21.5 DSU Appellate Body Report United States - Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint): Spillovers from Defense R&D Add to the Tug-of-War between Panels and the WTO Appellate Body

机译:第21.5条DSU上诉机构报告美国 - 影响大型民用飞机贸易的措施(第二次投诉):防御研发的溢出效果增加了面板和世贸组织之间的拔河和世贸组织

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The March 2019 release of the Appellate Body's compliance report in United States - Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint) marks yet another chapter in the ongoing Boeing-Airbus dispute. While raising numerous new and old subsidy issues, this paper focuses on one specific aspect, the evaluation of the financial contributions and benefits associated with the Department of Defense (DOD) R&D procurement contracts. The paper describes the differing views taken by the panels compared to the Appellate Body. It highlights two issues that led to an extremely lengthy proceeding: (1) the black or white nature of the decision regarding the characterization of contracts which have features of both purchases of services and joint ventures; and (2) the difficulty in demonstrating a financial contribution flowing from payments for R&D for military systems to Boeing's civil aircraft production. It concludes that this case represents a failure of the WTO dispute settlement system and underscores flaws in the ASCM in that after fifteen years of litigation, no determination was made as to whether or not the DOD R&D contracts examined here constituted impermissible subsidies.
机译:2019年3月发布了美国上诉机构的合规报告 - 影响大型民用飞机(第二次投诉)贸易的措施标志着正在进行的波音航空公司争端的另一员。虽然提高了众多新的补贴问题,但本文重点介绍了一个具体方面,评估与国防部(DOD)研发采购合同有关的财务贡献和福利。本文描述了与上诉机构相比面板所采取的不同视图。它突出了两个问题,导致了极其冗长的程序:(1)决定的黑色或白色性质,了解合同的特征,具有购买服务和合资企业的特征; (2)难以展示从R&D的支付流动的财务贡献,用于波音的民用飞机生产。结论是,本案例代表了世贸组织争端解决系统的失败,即ASCM中的危险缺陷,即在诉讼十五年后,无论是在此检查的国防部研发合约是否构成了不允许的补贴。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号