...
首页> 外文期刊>World intellectual property report >Federal Court Clarifies Burden of Proof in Counterfeit, Parallel Import Cases
【24h】

Federal Court Clarifies Burden of Proof in Counterfeit, Parallel Import Cases

机译:联邦法院澄清了假冒,平行进口案件中的举证责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The German Federal Court of Justice held that in a counterfeit case the trademark owner is not obliged to prove the counterfeit nature of the product but that it is for the defendant to prove the product's authenticity and the exhaustion of the trademark rights. It also clarified under which conditions the burden of proof regarding exhaustion may shift to the trademark owner (Cases I ZR 52/10 and I ZR 137/10 ("Converse I and II"), Federal Court of Justice, March 15, 2012).
机译:德国联邦法院认为,在假冒案件中,商标所有人没有义务证明产品的假冒性质,而是由被告证明产品的真实性和商标权的用尽。它还澄清了在哪种情况下,有关用尽的举证责任可能转移给商标所有者(第I ZR 52/10号和第I ZR 137/10号案件(“ I和II逆向”),联邦法院,2012年3月15日) 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号