...
首页> 外文期刊>The World Economy >Domestic Distortions and the Early Emergence of the International Trade in Fire Insurance from the UK
【24h】

Domestic Distortions and the Early Emergence of the International Trade in Fire Insurance from the UK

机译:英国的国内扭曲与国际火灾保险贸易的早期兴起

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

British success in the late nineteenth century in positioning itself as the hub of the world economy is often interpreted as a triumph for liberalisation and free markets. Of course, there is a sense in which this was true. Britain's commitment to free trade and its willingness to specialise intensively in industry and services, whatever the cost for its agricultural sector, was a central element in enabling development in many primary economies across the world - and holds an important lesson for those concerned with trade negotiations at the beginning of the twenty-first century. But this commitment only took place after a prolonged domestic political battle and when Britain's first-mover advantages in industry and services had created such a strong comparative advantage that free trade was increasingly evidently a matter of national self-interest. The subsequent reinforcement of Britain's pre-eminence, especially in the role of the City of London as merchant and financier to the world, relied similarly on complex institutional and market issues that should never be simplistically interpreted through ex post rationalisation as the triumph of the market. This paper has offered an interpretation of the success of British insurance overseas that gives a central role to the highly collusive character of the business. This seems at least as convincing an argument as those that rely on dynamic entrepreneurship or on detailed institutional aspects of the firms involved. And it is certainly more convincing than arguments that rely on the highly competitive nature of British insurance markets. It seems highly likely this interpretation could be paralleled in other important sectors of Britain's overseas endeavours, especially, but not exclusively, banking. It seems that domestic distortions may not be simply problems to be accommodated by policy in the growth of trade. They may be important sources of change that shape the process itself.
机译:英国在19世纪晚期成功地将自己定位为世界经济的枢纽,通常被解释为自由化和自由市场的胜利。当然,从某种意义上说这是真的。英国对自由贸易的承诺及其愿意专注于工业和服务业的意愿,而不论其农业部门的成本如何,这是实现世界许多主要经济体发展的核心要素,并且对那些与贸易谈判有关的人士来说是一个重要的教训在二十一世纪初。但是,只有在长期的国内政治斗争之后,以及英国在工业和服务业的先发优势创造了如此强大的比较优势,以至于自由贸易显然已越来越成为国家自身利益的问题时,这项承诺才发生。随后英国地位的增强,尤其是伦敦市作为世界商人和金融家的作用,同样依赖复杂的制度和市场问题,决不能通过事后合理化简单地解释为市场的胜利。 。本文对英国保险在海外的成功进行了解释,为该业务的高度共谋性发挥了核心作用。这似乎至少像那些依靠动态企业家精神或所涉公司的详细制度方面的论点令人信服。当然,这比依靠英国保险市场的高度竞争性质的论点更具说服力。这种解释似乎很可能与英国海外努力的其他重要领域相提并论,特别是但不仅限于银行业。看来,国内扭曲可能不仅仅是解决贸易增长中政策需要解决的问题。它们可能是决定流程本身的重要变更源。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The World Economy》 |2006年第11期|p.1629-1641|共13页
  • 作者

    Oliver M. Westall;

  • 作者单位

    Lancaster University Management School;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 f;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号