首页> 外文期刊>Working Paper Series. Monetary Economics >Optimal Inflation Targeting under Alternative Fiscal Regimes
【24h】

Optimal Inflation Targeting under Alternative Fiscal Regimes

机译:替代性财政体制下的最优通胀目标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Standard discussions of flexible inflation targeting as an optimal monetary policy abstract completely from the consequences of monetary policy for the government budget. But at least some of the countries now adopting inflation targeting have substantial difficulty in controlling fiscal imbalances, so that the additional strains resulting from strict control of inflation are of substantial concern, and some (notably Sims 2005) have argued that inflation targeting can even be counterproductive under some fiscal regimes. Here, therefore, we analyze welfare-maximizing monetary policy taking explicit account of the consequences of monetary policy for the government budget, and under a variety of assumptions about the nature of the fiscal regime. The paper contrasts the optimal monetary policies under three alternative assumptions about fiscal policy: (ⅰ) the case in which little distortion is required to raise additional government revenue, and the fiscal authority can be relied upon to ensure intertemporal government solvency [the implicit assumption in standard analyses]; (ⅱ) the case in which only distorting sources of revenue exist, but distorting taxes are adjusted optimally; and (ⅲ) the case in which tax rates cannot be expected to change in response to a change in monetary policy [the problematic case emphasized by Sims]. In both of cases (ⅱ) and (ⅲ), it is optimal for monetary policy to allow the inflation rate to respond to fiscal developments (and the optimal responses to other shocks are somewhat different than in the classic analysis, which assumes case (I)). Nonetheless, optimal monetary policy can still be implemented through a form of flexible inflation targeting, and it remains critical, even in the most pessimistic case (case (ⅲ)), that inflation expectations (beyond some very short horizon) not be allowed to vary in response to shocks.
机译:关于将通货膨胀目标确定为最佳货币政策的标准讨论完全从货币政策对政府预算的影响中抽象出来。但是现在至少有一些采用通货膨胀目标制的国家在控制财政失衡方面有很大的困难,因此,严格控制通货膨胀所造成的额外压力是令人严重关切的,有些国家(特别是Sims 2005)认为通货膨胀目标制甚至可以在某些财政体制下适得其反。因此,在这里,我们在充分考虑货币政策对政府预算的影响的情况下,并在对财政体制性质的各种假设下,分析了福利最大化的货币政策。本文在关于财政政策的三个备选假设下对比了最优货币政策:(ⅰ)几乎不需要扭曲就可以增加政府额外收入的情况,并且可以依靠财政权力来确保政府间期偿付能力[标准分析]; (ⅱ)仅存在扭曲的收入来源,而扭曲的税收得到了最佳调整的情况; (ⅲ)不能期望税率因货币政策的变化而变化的情况(西姆斯强调的有问题的情况)。在(ⅱ)和(ⅲ)两种情况下,货币政策的最佳选择都是允许通货膨胀率对财政发展做出反应(并且对其他冲击的最佳反应与经典分析有所不同,后者假设情况为(I ))。尽管如此,最优货币政策仍然可以通过灵活的通货膨胀目标制来实施,并且即使在最悲观的情况下(案例(ⅲ)),通货膨胀预期(超出某些非常短的视野)也不允许改变,这一点仍然至关重要。应对冲击。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号