...
首页> 外文期刊>Working Paper Series. Monetary Economics >WHEN DOES POLICY REFORM WORK? THE CASE OF CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE
【24h】

WHEN DOES POLICY REFORM WORK? THE CASE OF CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE

机译:政策何时会生效?中央银行独立的情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We argue that the question of whether and when policy reform works should be investigated together with the political economy factors responsible for distortionary policies in the first place. These not only determine the initial distortions, but also often shape policy in the post-reform environment. Distortionary policies arc more likely to be adopted when politicians are unconstrained and unaccountable to citizens. This reasoning implies that policy reform should have modest effects in societies where the political system already places constraints on politicians. It also implies, however, that in societies with weak political constraints, which are often those adopting the most distortionary policies, policy reforms may be ineffective because the underlying political economy problems arc not typically altered by these reforms. Policy reform should therefore have its largest effect in societies with intermediate levels of constraints. In addition, when policy reform is (partly) effective, it may lead to a deterioration in other (unrcformed) components of policy in order to satisfy the underlying demands on politicians - a phenomenon we call the seesaw effect. We provide reduced-form evidence consistent with these ideas by looking at the effect of central bank independence on inflation. The evidence is consistent with the notion that central bank reforms have reduced inflation in societies with intermediate constraints and have had no or little effects in countries with the high and low levels of constraints. We also present some evidence suggesting that, consistent with the seesaw effect, in countries where central bank reforms reduce inflation, government expenditure tends to increase.
机译:我们认为,首先应该研究政策改革是否以及何时生效的问题,以及负责扭曲政策的政治经济因素。这些不仅决定了最初的失真,而且还经常在改革后的环境中制定政策。当政客不受约束且对公民不负责任时,更可能采用扭曲政策。这种推论意味着,在政治制度已经对政客施加约束的社会中,政策改革应该产生适度的影响。但是,这也意味着,在政治约束薄弱的社会(通常是那些采用最扭曲的政策的社会)中,政策改革可能是无效的,因为根本的政治经济问题通常不会因这些改革而改变。因此,政策改革应在中等限制水平的社会中发挥最大作用。此外,当政策改革(部分)有效时,可能会导致其他(未改革的)政策组成恶化,以满足对政客的基本需求-这种现象我们称为跷跷板效应。通过研究央行独立性对通货膨胀的影响,我们提供了与这些想法一致的简化形式的证据。证据与以下观点相吻合:中央银行改革已降低了具有中等约束条件的社会的通货膨胀,并且在具有高约束水平和低约束水平的国家中没有产生或产生了很小的影响。我们还提供了一些证据表明,与跷跷板效应相一致,在中央银行改革降低通货膨胀的国家中,政府支出趋于增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号