首页> 外文期刊>Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation >Ergonomic interventions for office workers with musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review
【24h】

Ergonomic interventions for office workers with musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review

机译:上班族肌肉骨骼疾病的人体工程学干预:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: Ergonomic interventions designed for office and computer work have become widely available and heavily marketed but there is little evidence to support their use with workers who already have a musculoskeletal disorder (MSD). The purpose of any ergonomic intervention can be to improve worker comfort, safety and/or productivity. The ergonomic research in secondary prevention typically focuses outcomes on improved worker comfort but less if any emphasis has been put on productivity and safety. The purpose of this study was to determine the level and quality of evidence supporting ergonomic interventions to improve the comfort, safety and/or productivity of office workers with symptoms of MSDs. Method: A search of the ergonomic intervention literature based on MSDs of four body areas (low back, upper limb, eye and neck) was employed. The studies underwent two levels of analysis for inclusion in a best-evidence synthesis approach, which included a priori evaluation of specific interventions relative to outcomes of comfort, safety and/or productivity.Results: Twenty-seven out of 202 articles were synthesized based on relevance, quality and significant results. Only 8 articles were determined high quality and no strong levels of evidence were identified. Levels of evidence for specific ergonomic interventions ranged from insufficient to moderate. Generally outcomes were focused mostly on improved comfort of workers.Conclusions: There is still limited quality research that addresses ergonomic interventions designed for secondary prevention. Further high quality studies are needed to support evidence-based ergonomic interventions in practice. For all stakeholders to fully evaluate the usefulness of the ergonomic intervention studies need to attend to outcomes not only of worker comfort but also to productivity and safety.
机译:简介:专为办公室和计算机工作而设计的人体工程学干预措施已经广泛使用并投放市场,但几乎没有证据支持将其用于已患有肌肉骨骼疾病(MSD)的工人。人体工程学干预的目的可以是改善工人的舒适度,安全性和/或生产率。二级预防中的人体工程学研究通常将结果重点放在改善工人的舒适度上,但是如果只强调生产率和安全性则较少。这项研究的目的是确定支持人体工程学干预措施以改善患有MSD症状的上班族的舒适度,安全性和/或生产率的证据的水平和质量。方法:根据四个身体部位(下背部,上肢,眼睛和颈部)的MSD检索人体工程学干预文献。研究进行了两个阶段的分析以纳入最佳证据综合方法,其中包括对与舒适度,安全性和/或生产率相关的特定干预措施进行先验评估。结果:202篇文章中有27篇基于相关性,质量和重大成果。确定只有8篇文章是高质量的,没有确定有力的证据。具体的人体工程学干预措施的证据级别从不足到中等。总的来说,结果主要集中在改善工人的舒适度上。结论:仍然有有限的质量研究涉及为二级预防设计的人体工程学干预措施。在实践中还需要进一步的高质量研究来支持基于证据的人体工程学干预。为了使所有利益相关者充分评估人机工程学干预措施的有用性,不仅要考虑工人的舒适度,还要考虑生产率和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号