首页> 外文期刊>Work, Employment and Society >Why are social scientists still reluctant to embrace email as data? An ethnographic examination of interactions within virtual teams
【24h】

Why are social scientists still reluctant to embrace email as data? An ethnographic examination of interactions within virtual teams

机译:为什么社会科学家仍然不愿意将电子邮件作为数据?民族志研究虚拟团队内部的互动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This research note examines why email is underused as a source of data within work and employment studies and provides an example of the usefulness of email for gaining a more detailed understanding of behaviour in the workplace. Three main reasons are identified for the hesitancy to use email as a source of data. Firstly, the confused role of email as formal and informal archival data as well as concerns regarding the immediate often non-deliberated exchanges; secondly, issues with access to and confidentiality of email data; finally, the challenges of triangulation of a data set which includes email data. The analysis of emails between virtual team members, alongside observational and interview methods, demonstrates how interactions between colleagues via email are subtly different to the way in which organizational members describe relationships in an interview situation and reveals how access to email data provides an additional resource in understanding behaviours within the workplace.
机译:本研究笔记探讨了为何在工作和就业研究中未充分利用电子邮件作为数据源,并举例说明了电子邮件对于更详细地了解工作场所行为的有用性。确定了使用电子邮件作为数据源的犹豫的三个主要原因。首先,电子邮件作为正式和非正式档案数据的混乱角色,以及对立即经常未经商议的交易的担忧;其次,电子邮件数据的访问和保密问题;最后,三角剖分包含电子邮件数据的数据集的挑战。对虚拟团队成员之间电子邮件的分析以及观察和访谈方法,证明了同事之间通过电子邮件进行的交互与组织成员在访谈情况下描述关系的方式有何细微差别,并揭示了如何访问电子邮件数据在以下方面提供了额外的资源了解工作场所的行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号