首页> 外文期刊>Wireless Communications, IEEE Transactions on >Distributed Power Allocation in Two-Hop Interference Channels: An Implicit-Based Approach
【24h】

Distributed Power Allocation in Two-Hop Interference Channels: An Implicit-Based Approach

机译:两跳干扰信道中的分布式功率分配:基于隐式的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The problem of distributed power allocation for an interference relay network is considered, where multiple source-relay-destination (S-R-D) links communicate concurrently in the same frequency and interfere over two hops, referred to as a two-hop interference channel. The direct source-destination connections are not considered in this work. Power allocation in this scenario is challenging as it necessitates not only performance tradeoff among multiple links but also power distribution for each link along spatial dimensions. We approach the problem from a game-theoretic perspective and propose a novel implicit-based approach to prove the uniqueness of the Nash equilibrium (NE). This technique complements the existing literature on equilibria analysis by revealing the benefits of expressing the best responses in implicit forms. To benchmark the performance of the NE, we have investigated the non-convex sum-utility maximization problem, and have 1) identified the optimal solution structures; 2) proved that linear pricing is locally optimal in maximizing the sum utilities. A simple and distributed pricing algorithm is then proposed. Simulation results show that for a two-user network, the proposed scheme closely approaches the optimal sum rate, while, for a ten-user network, the improvement is up to 340% compared to the non-cooperative game model without pricing.
机译:考虑了用于干扰中继网络的分布式功率分配问题,其中多个源中继目的地(S-R-D)链路以相同的频率同时通信,并在称为“两跳”干扰信道的两跳上发生干扰。本工作不考虑直接的源-目的地连接。在这种情况下,功率分配具有挑战性,因为它不仅需要在多个链路之间进行性能折衷,而且还需要沿空间维度为每个链路分配功率。我们从博弈论的角度解决这个问题,并提出一种新颖的基于隐式的方法来证明纳什均衡(NE)的唯一性。这项技术通过揭示以隐式形式表示最佳响应的好处,对现有的平衡分析文献进行了补充。为了对NE的性能进行基准测试,我们研究了非凸和和效用最大化问题,并得出以下结论:1)确定了最佳解决方案结构; 2)证明了线性定价在最大化总和效用方面是局部最优的。然后提出了一种简单的分布式定价算法。仿真结果表明,对于两用户网络,该方案接近最优总和率;而对于十用户网络,与没有定价的非合作博弈模型相比,改进幅度高达340%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号