首页> 外文期刊>The wilson journal of ornithology >EFFECTS OF TRAFFIC NOISE ON AUDITORY SURVEYS OF URBAN WHITE-WINGED DOVES
【24h】

EFFECTS OF TRAFFIC NOISE ON AUDITORY SURVEYS OF URBAN WHITE-WINGED DOVES

机译:交通噪声对城市白鸽鸽子听觉调查的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We investigated the effects of urban noise on auditory surveys of White-winged Doves (Zen-aida asiatica) in two major cities in Texas. We conducted auditory point counts throughout the morning in San Antonio (n = 6) and Austin (n = 10) during week days (when traffic noise is higher) and weekends. We categorized survey points as near or far from roads (<0.8 and >0.8 km, respectively) for comparison. We documented no difference in density estimates in Austin between week days (46 ±10 pairs/ha) and weekends (52 ± 10 pairs/ha; P = 0.23); however, weekend estimates were consistently higher throughout the morning. Weekend density estimates in San Antonio were higher after 0620 hrs (P < 0.04), the time coinciding with beginning of the morning commute during week days in this city. We documented that weekend estimates (45 ± 5 pairs/ha) were higher than week day estimates (33 ± 5 pairs/ha) for points near roads (within 0.8 km; P = 0.02) but not for points far from roads (P = 0.16). Our results indicate that traffic noise can bias auditory surveys. Survey methods that account for probability of detection should be used to correct for potential noise bias.
机译:我们调查了得克萨斯州两个主要城市的白噪声鸽子(Zen-aida asiatica)听觉调查中城市噪声的影响。我们在工作日(交通噪音较高时)和周末在圣安东尼奥(n = 6)和奥斯汀(n = 10)整个上午进行听觉点计数。我们将调查点归类为距道路近或远(分别<0.8和> 0.8 km)以进行比较。我们记录了在工作日(46±10对/公顷)和周末(52±10对/公顷; P = 0.23)之间,奥斯丁的密度估算值没有差异。但是,周末的估计值在整个上午一直较高。圣安东尼奥市的周末密度估计值在0620小时之后更高(P <0.04),该时间与该城市在工作日的早上上下班时间一致。我们记录到,对于靠近道路(在0.8公里内; P = 0.02)的地点,周末估计值(45±5对/公顷)高于工作日的估计值(33±5对/公顷),但对于远离道路的点则不是(P = 0.02) 0.16)。我们的结果表明,交通噪声会影响听觉调查。考虑到检测概率的调查方法应用于校正潜在的噪声偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号