Comparing Measures of Average Color Fidelity

摘要

The introduction of new measures of color rendition, especially IES TM-30-15, has stirred debate within the lighting industry on the relative merits of the tools, as well as the amount of difference between the new tools and prior tools, such as CIE R-a. This article focuses on comparing three measures of average color fidelity: IES R-f, CIE R-a, and CIE R-f. Using a large set of commercially available, experimental, and theoretical spectral power distributions (SPDs), the analysis contrasts past efforts to make similar comparisons using smaller or more focused data sets. It highlights the interactive effect of gamut shape and color space nonuniformity, which results in a range of IES R-f values of at least 50 to 86 for SPDs having a CIE R-a value of 80. It also examines how these differences can be overlooked in psychophysical experiments relying on a small number of SPDs, which can present misleading findings on the value and meaning of the measures. When considering the results, it is important to remember that average color fidelity is only one aspect of color rendition.