首页> 外文期刊>Wetlands >ASSESSMENT OF WETLANDS IN THE UPPER JUNIATA WATERSHED IN PENNSYLVANIA, USA USING THE HYDROGEOMORPHIC APPROACH
【24h】

ASSESSMENT OF WETLANDS IN THE UPPER JUNIATA WATERSHED IN PENNSYLVANIA, USA USING THE HYDROGEOMORPHIC APPROACH

机译:应用水文地理学方法对美国宾夕法尼亚州上游朱尼塔河流域的湿地进行评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper reports on the ecological status of wetlands in the Upper Juniata watershed in Pennsylvania, USA, as determined by employing the hydrogeomorphic (HGM) approach. HGM assessment provides a measure of the potential functional performance of a single wetland for up to 11 functions, depending on the subclass. Functional Capacity Index (FC1) scores calculated for each function range between a score of 1 (indicates the site is performing at optimum levels) and a score of 0 (indicates the site is not performing the function). Mean scores for all functions for the wetland resource in the Upper Juniata ranged from 0.48-0.63, except for Long-term Surface-Water Storage (0.39) and Characteristic Hydrology (0.85). Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) plots were fairly linear over most of the distribution for all functions, indicating that the FCI scores were evenly distributed over the population. Several of the plots flattened at the upper and/or lower ends of the curves, indicating that a very small proportion of the wetland area had the highest and lowest scores. Clustering of the 69 riverine and slope sites using the FCI scores from the three functions with the most well-developed models resulted in the formation of four Functional Status Groups (FSGs). Groups 1 and 2 represented relatively high functioning groups of sites. They were differentiated by an exceptionally high Plant Community Function in Group 1 that differed significantly from the low value in Group 2. FSG's 3 and 4 represented relatively low functioning groups of sites and were differentiated by a significantly high Vertebrate Community Function in Group 3. We defined three reference domains (Natural, Agricultural, and Developed) based on predominant land cover. Sites of any given FSG were distributed across the reference domains, but there were some differences in distribution. Sites in the Natural Domain were much more likely to be in the higher functioning FSGs, while the Agricultural Domain was dominated by sites with an overall low level of functioning. Sites in the Developed Domain are equally distributed across the four FSGs. In summary, we demonstrated how HGM assessment might be employed to describe the functional status of the wetland resource in a watershed. We also demonstrated how the results of the assessment could be (1) used to evaluate the efficacy of the models comprising the HGM assessment and (2) combined with other data to identify relationships that could be used to develop management approaches.
机译:本文报道了美国宾夕法尼亚州上朱尼亚塔流域的湿地生态状况,该状况已通过水文地理(HGM)方法确定。 HGM评估提供了一个单一湿地多达11种功能的潜在功能性能的度量,具体取决于子类。为每个功能范围计算的功能能力指数(FC1)得分介于1(表明该站点正在以最佳水平执行)和0(表明该站点未执行该功能)之间。除长期的地表水储量(0.39)和特征水文学(0.85)以外,朱尼亚塔河上游湿地资源所有功能的平均评分在0.48-0.63之间。累积分布函数(CDF)图在所有函数的大部分分布上都呈线性关系,这表明FCI得分在总体上平均分布。数个图在曲线的上端和/或下端变平,表明湿地面积的极小部分具有最高和最低得分。使用来自三个功能最完善的模型的FCI得分对69个河流和斜坡站点进行聚类,从而形成了四个功能状态组(FSG)。组1和2代表功能较高的站点组。它们的区别在于第1组中的植物群落功能异常高,而第2组中的植物群落功能显着不同。FSG的3和4代表了功能较低的位点组,而第3组中的脊椎动物群落功能却明显较高。根据主要的土地覆被定义了三个参考域(自然,农业和发达)。任何给定FSG的站点都分布在整个参考域中,但是分布方面存在一些差异。自然领域的站点更有可能位于功能较高的FSG中,而农业领域的站点则总体上处于较低的功能水平。已开发域中的站点平均分布在四个FSG中。总之,我们演示了如何使用HGM评估来描述流域中湿地资源的功能状态。我们还演示了评估结果如何可以用于(1)评估包含HGM评估的模型的有效性,以及(2)与其他数据结合以识别可用于开发管理方法的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号