...
首页> 外文期刊>West European Politics >Accountability and Transparency: Siamese Twins, Matching Parts, Awkward Couple?
【24h】

Accountability and Transparency: Siamese Twins, Matching Parts, Awkward Couple?

机译:问责制和透明度:连体双胞胎,匹配零件,尴尬的夫妻?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper contrasts three possible ways of thinking about the relationship between accountability and transparency as principles of governance: as a??Siamese twinsa??, not really distinguishable; as a??matching partsa?? that are separable but nevertheless complement one another smoothly to produce good governance; and as a??awkward couplea??, involving elements that are potentially or actually in tension with one another. It then identifies three possible ways in which we could establish the accuracy or plausibility of each of those three characterisations. One is a search for true essences that would separate true from spurious meanings. A second is to dimensionalise each of the concepts and explore the matrix of connectivity between the dimensions. A third is to explore the multiple frames for thinking about accountability and transparency that come from the neo-Durkheimian analysis of the limited number of elementary ways of life developed by the late Mary Douglas and her followers. The analytic utility of this approach is that it allows us to identify four different ways of thinking about transparency and accountability and the links between them.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.486122
机译:本文对比了三种将问责制与透明度之间的关系作为治理原则的思考方式:作为“暹罗双胞胎”,没有真正的区别;作为“匹配零件”?这些是可分离的,但仍然可以顺利地互补以产生良好的治理;并且作为“尴尬的耦合”,涉及可能或实际上彼此紧张的元素。然后,它确定了三种可能的方式,可以用来确定这三个特征中每个特征的准确性或合理性。一种是寻找将真假与假义分开的真本质。第二个是确定每个概念的尺寸,并探索尺寸之间的连通性矩阵。第三,探索新的杜克海姆主义对已故的玛丽·道格拉斯及其追随者所发展的有限的基本生活方式的分析所产生的思考问责制和透明度的多个框架。这种方法的分析实用程序使我们能够确定关于透明度和问责制以及它们之间的链接的四种不同思考方式。查看全文下载全文相关的变量,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.486122

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号