首页> 外文期刊>West European Politics >State-Society Relationships, Social Trust and the Development of Labour Market Policies in Italy and Sweden
【24h】

State-Society Relationships, Social Trust and the Development of Labour Market Policies in Italy and Sweden

机译:意大利和瑞典的国家社会关系,社会信任与劳动力市场政策的发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The first decade of the twenty-first century may be remembered for the rebirth of consensus on labour market policy. After three decades of bitter political and ideological controversy between a neo-liberal and a traditional social democratic approach, a new model, often labelled flexicurity, has emerged. This model is promoted by numerous political organisations since it promises to put an end to the old trade-off between equality and efficiency. Several countries are embracing the flexicurity model as a blueprint for labour market reform, but others, mostly belonging to the 'Mediterranean Rim', are clearly lagging behind. Why is it so difficult for these countries to implement the flexicurity model? This paper argues that the application of a flexicurity strategy in these countries is complicated by the lack of social trust between social partners and the state as well as political economy traditions that highlight the role of labour market regulation as a source of social protection.
机译:劳动力市场政策的共识的诞生可能会铭记二十世纪的前十年。在新自由主义与传统的社会民主主义方法之间经过了三十年的激烈政治和意识形态争论之后,出现了一种新的模式,通常被称为“灵活性”。许多政治组织都提倡这种模式,因为它有望结束平等与效率之间的旧权衡。有几个国家将灵活性模型作为劳动力市场改革的蓝图,但其他国家(主要属于“地中海沿岸”)显然落后。为什么这些国家实施弹性模型如此困难?本文认为,由于社会伙伴与国家之间缺乏社会信任,以及强调劳动力市场调节作为社会保护来源的作用的政治经济学传统,挠曲性策略在这些国家的应用变得复杂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号