首页> 外文期刊>Waterworld >Planning for Automation System Upgrades: Total Replacement versus Phased Migration
【24h】

Planning for Automation System Upgrades: Total Replacement versus Phased Migration

机译:计划自动化系统升级:全面更换与分阶段迁移

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the water and wastewater industries, most facilities are designed with a 20-25 year life cycle and the installed equipment is expected to last the duration. Yet, in the field of integrated circuitry the obsolescence rate is less then five years. This has an impact on the computers, SCADA hardware and programmable automation controller (PAC) hardware found in water and wastewater facilities. Most automation vendors have done an excellent job of recognizing this challenge and continue to manufacture parts long after a product line has become obsolete. However, an aging automation system's obsolete components translate to indefinite costs, unpredictable maintenance requirements and increased potential for downtime. When municipalities think about retrofitting their existing automation system and software, often their thoughts turn to the immense burden, risk and cost associated with an upgrade. Upgrading automation systems shouldn't be considered from merely a short-term perspective, though. When properly analyzed, the increased reliability, enhanced processing power and other long-term benefits often outweigh the time and cost invested today.
机译:在自来水和废水行业中,大多数设施的设计寿命为20-25年,安装的设备有望持续使用。但是,在集成电路领域,过时率不到五年。这会对水和废水处理设施中的计算机,SCADA硬件和可编程自动化控制器(PAC)硬件产生影响。大多数自动化供应商在意识到这一挑战方面做得非常出色,并且在产品线淘汰后很长时间仍继续制造零件。但是,老化的自动化系统的过时组件会导致不确定的成本,不可预测的维护要求以及增加的停机可能性。当市政当局考虑改造其现有的自动化系统和软件时,他们的想法常常转向与升级相关的巨大负担,风险和成本。但是,不应仅从短期的角度考虑升级自动化系统。如果进行适当的分析,那么增加的可靠性,增强的处理能力和其他长期利益通常会超过今天所花费的时间和成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号