首页> 外文期刊>Water >Aquaphemera
【24h】

Aquaphemera

机译:海藻

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Having criticised economists in the last two Aquaphemera's for their ideas on water reform, it seems only fair that I put up my alternatives so they can wreak their revenge. The first and most critical point is that before implementing any changes, a rigorous triple bottom line analysis needs to be undertaken (like that done for any large water infrastructure project). This analysis needs to cover all those who are directly and consequently affected -especially in the wider community. For example, little analysis seemed to be undertaken on the effects on rural communities in irrigation areas before water trading was introduced (or at least little consideration of how to ameliorate the impacts in the short term). Similarly, proposals to introduce water retailers and distributors, as done in electricity to provide competition, has not shown any analysis of the impact on utility's standards of service on utility shareholders or on consumers.
机译:在过去两个Aquaphemera中批评经济学家的水改革思想之后,我提出替代方案以便他们报仇是很公平的。第一个也是最关键的一点是,在进行任何更改之前,需要进行严格的三重底线分析(就像对任何大型水利基础设施项目所做的那样)。该分析需要涵盖所有直接受影响的人,尤其是在更广泛的社区中。例如,在引入水贸易之前,似乎很少对灌溉区对农村社区的影响进行分析(或者至少很少考虑如何在短期内改善影响)。同样,关于引入水的零售商和分销商的提议(如通过电力提供竞争的提议)并未显示出对公用事业服务标准对公用事业股东或消费者的影响的任何分析。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water》 |2008年第4期|p.6|共1页
  • 作者

    Ross Knee;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 市政工程;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号