首页> 外文期刊>Water >WATER PRICING: THE ISSUE THAT NEVER GOES AWAY
【24h】

WATER PRICING: THE ISSUE THAT NEVER GOES AWAY

机译:水价:永远不会消失的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Is there any other commodity or service of which the price is so frequently reported on and debated as water? I think not, and it has been that way for decades - although in the past five years electricity has possibly come a close second.In the past few weeks alone, the Water Corporation of Western Australia has testified before a Parliamentary Committee about water prices, the South Australian Government is inquiring into water prices for sporting clubs, and ACTEW is being investigated after a very arduous price-setting process. Even during the recent major drought, we rarely saw articles about the price of fruit and vegetables - in spite of the fact that they went up considerably - but we always have plenty of print and electronic media coverage of water prices.The amount of money paid each year by water consumers for their water and sewerage services is actually quite modest compared to the rest of the household or enterprise budget. IPART in New South Wales and ESC in Victoria have made water pricing less political for over 20 years now, and have been very successful in focusing the natural monopolies in water and other utilities on value for money and performance standards.
机译:是否还有其他商品或服务的价格经常像水一样被报道和争论?我认为不是,而且几十年来一直如此。尽管在过去五年中,电力供应可能紧随其后。仅在过去的几周中,西澳大利亚州自来水公司就向国会提交了关于水价的证词,南澳大利亚州政府正在调查体育俱乐部的水价,而ACTEW在经过非常艰巨的价格制定过程后正在接受调查。即使在最近的大干旱期间,尽管水果和蔬菜价格大幅上涨,我们也很少见到有关水果和蔬菜价格的文章-但我们始终对水价始终有大量的印刷和电子媒体报道。与其他家庭或企业预算相比,用水者每年每年用于供水和排污服务的费用实际上是很少的。二十多年来,新南威尔士州的IPART和维多利亚州的ESC降低了水价政策的合理性,并已成功地将水和其他公用事业的自然垄断重点放在了物有所值和性能标准上。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water》 |2013年第8期|2-2|共1页
  • 作者

    Graham Dooley;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号