首页> 外文期刊>Water >IMPLICATIONS OF ABOLISHING THE REPRESENTATIVE STANDING PROVISION UNDER THE EPBC ACT
【24h】

IMPLICATIONS OF ABOLISHING THE REPRESENTATIVE STANDING PROVISION UNDER THE EPBC ACT

机译:在ePBC法案下废除代表性常设规定的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Samantha Hepburn is a Professor in the Law School at Deakin University and Director of EMI Partners. Samantha is one of Australia's preeminent legal scholars whose research involves the examination of a range of different energy, natural resource, property and land law issues. Her career highlights for 2015 include the publication of her book with Cambridge University Press, Mining and Energy Law, working with the Victorian Auditor General to prepare the terms of reference paper for the Victorian Parliamentary Commission into Unconventional Gas, and being a keynote presenter at the 2015 Sydney ATSE Unconventional Gas Conference and the 2015 Sydney Carbon Abatement Conference.The Federal Government wants to repeal Section 487(2) of the Environmental Protection Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth)(EPBC) and rely on the common law provisions that govern standing to seek judicial review of a decision under the Act. Section 487(2) is the representative standing provision in our national environmental legislation. It provides environmental and conservation groups with the ability to seek review of decisions made under the EPBC Act without having to establish that their private interests have been directly affected. In this respect, the provision is known as the 'representative standing' provision. The direct effect of the amendment will be, henceforth, to prevent environmental and conservation groups from having any capacity to seek judicial reviewbecause they will not have standing. This, in turn, will reduce the incidence of judicial oversight of decisions made under the EPBC Act.
机译:Samantha Hepburn是Deakin University和Emi Partners主任的法学院教授。萨曼莎是澳大利亚卓越的法律学者之一,其研究涉及考察一系列不同的能源,自然资源,财产和土地法问题。 2015年的职业生涯亮点包括与剑桥大学出版社,采矿和能源法的出版,与维多利亚时代的审计员将维多利亚人议会委员会的参考文件条款制定为非规范天然气,并成为一个主题演讲者2015年悉尼非传统的天然气会议和2015年悉尼碳减排会议。联邦政府希望废除1999年(CTH)(ePBC)的环境保护生物多样性保护法第487(2)条,并依赖于管理常规法律规定,该规定在行为下寻求司法审查司法审查。第487(2)条是我们国家环境立法中的代表性规定。它提供了环境和保护群体,能够寻求在ePBC法案下的决定审查的能力,而无需确定其私人利益直接受到影响。在这方面,该规定被称为“代表站立”规定。根据“修正案”的直接效应将是为了防止环境和保护群体有任何能力寻求司法审查因为他们不会站立。反过来,这将减少司法监督司法监督的发病率。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water》 |2015年第7期|6-7|共2页
  • 作者

    Samantha Hepburn;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号