首页> 外文期刊>Water resources research >Determining in-channel (dead zone) transient storage by comparing solute transport in a bedrock channel-alluvial channel sequence, Oregon
【24h】

Determining in-channel (dead zone) transient storage by comparing solute transport in a bedrock channel-alluvial channel sequence, Oregon

机译:通过比较俄勒冈州基岩河道冲积河道序列中的溶质运移来确定河道内(死区)瞬态存储

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current stream tracer techniques do not allow separation of in-channel dead zone (e.g., eddies) and out-of-channel (hyporheic) transient storage, yet this separation is important to understanding stream biogeochemical processes. We characterize in-channel transient storage with a rhodamine WT solute tracer experiment in a 304 m cascade-pool-type bedrock reach with no hyporheic zone. We compare the solute breakthrough curve (BTC) from this reach to that of an adjacent 367 m alluvial reach with significant hyporheic exchange. In the bedrock reach, transient storage has an exponential residence time distribution with a mean residence time of 3.0 hours and a ratio of transient storage to stream volume of 0.14, demonstrating that at moderate discharge, bedrock in-channel storage zones provide a small volume of transient storage with substantial residence time. In the alluvial reach, though pools are similar in size to those in the bedrock reach, transient storage has a power law residence time distribution with a mean residence time of > 100 hours (estimated at nearly 1200 hours) and a ratio of storage to stream volume of 105. Because the in-channel hydraulics of bedrock reaches are simpler than alluvial step-pool reaches, the bedrock results are probably a lower end-member with respect to volume and residence time, though they demonstrate that in-channel storage may be appreciable in some reaches. These results suggest that in-stream dead zone transient storage may be accurately simulated by exponential RTDs but that hyporheic exchange is better simulated with a power law RTD as a consequence of more complicated flow path and exchange dynamics.
机译:当前的流示踪剂技术不允许分离通道内的死区(例如,涡流)和通道外的(疏水的)瞬态存储,但是这种分离对于理解流的生物地球化学过程是重要的。我们用若丹明WT溶质示踪剂实验在304 m梯级池型基岩河段中(无下流带)表征了通道内的瞬态存储。我们将溶质突破曲线(BTC)从该河段与相邻的367 m冲积河段(具有明显的流变交换)进行了比较。在基岩河段,瞬态存储具有指数停留时间分布,平均停留时间为3.0小时,瞬态存储与水流体积之比为0.14,这表明在中等流量下,基岩通道内存储区域提供的体积很小。具有大量停留时间的瞬时存储。在冲积河段中,尽管池的大小与基岩河段中的池相似,但瞬态存储具有幂律停留时间分布,平均停留时间> 100小时(估计为近1200小时),并且存储与流的比率体积为105。由于基岩河段的通道内水力比冲积阶梯池的河段更简单,因此就体积和停留时间而言,基岩结果可能是一个较低的最终构件,尽管它们表明通道内存储可能是在某些范围内是可观的。这些结果表明,可以通过指数RTD精确地模拟流内死区瞬态存储,但由于流径和交换动力学更加复杂,因此利用幂律RTD更好地模拟了流变交换。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号