首页> 外文期刊>Water resources research >How can rainfall-runoff models handle intercatchment groundwater flows? Theoretical study based on 1040 French catchments
【24h】

How can rainfall-runoff models handle intercatchment groundwater flows? Theoretical study based on 1040 French catchments

机译:降雨径流模型如何处理集水区间的地下水流?基于1040个法国流域的理论研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines the possible solutions that may allow a rainfall-runoff model to cope with the existence of unknown intercatchment groundwater flows over a given catchment. On the basis of a large catchment set we compare four versions of the GR4J and the SMAR rainfall-runoff models that differ in the way they use one of their parameters to adjust catchment-scale water balance. We show that from both the hydrological likelihood and the modeling efficiency point of view it is preferable to explicitly represent intercatchment groundwater transfers. The surrogate corrective solutions tested in this paper (correcting or scaling factors applied to the climatic input data or to the catchment area) that are sometimes used in practice could be used on the sole grounds of streamflow simulation efficiency, but we show that they should be avoided since they may lead to obviously unrealistic corrections and consequently yield a similarly unrealistic distribution between evaporation streamflow and underground fluxes.
机译:本文研究了可能的解决方案,这些解决方案可以使降雨径流模型处理给定集水区中未知的集水区间地下水流。在大型集水区基础上,我们比较了GR4J和SMAR降雨-径流模型的四个版本,它们在使用其参数之一来调整集水规模水平衡方面的方式有所不同。我们表明,从水文可能性和建模效率的角度来看,最好明确表示集水区之间的地下水转移。本文中测试的替代校正解决方案(应用于气候输入数据或集水区的校正因子或比例因子)有时在实践中使用,可以仅出于模拟水流效率的考虑而使用,但我们表明应采用避免使用它们,因为它们可能导致明显不切实际的校正,并因此在蒸发流和地下通量之间产生类似不切实际的分布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号