...
首页> 外文期刊>Water resources research >An empirical geomorphology-based approach to the spatial prediction of soil thickness at catchment scale
【24h】

An empirical geomorphology-based approach to the spatial prediction of soil thickness at catchment scale

机译:基于经验地貌的流域尺度土壤厚度空间预测方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Catchment modeling in areas dominated by active geomorphologic processes, such as soil erosion and landsliding, is often hampered by the lack of reliable methods for the spatial estimation of soil depth. In a catchment, soil thickness h can vary as a function of many different and interplaying factors, such as underlying lithology, climate, gradient, hillslope curvature, upslope contributing area, and vegetation cover, making the distributed estimation of h challenging and often unreliable. In this work we present an alternative methodology which links soil thickness to gradient, horizontal and vertical slope curvature, and relative position within the hillslope profile. While the relationship with gradient and curvature should reflect the kinematic stability of the regolith cover, allowing greater soil thicknesses over planar and concave areas, the distance from the hill crest (or from the valley bottom) accounts for the position within the soil toposequence. This last parameter is fundamental; points having equal gradient and curvature can have significantly different soil thickness due to their dissimilar position along the hillslope profile. The proposed model has been implemented in a geographic information system environment and tested in the Terzona Creek basin in central Italy. Results are in good agreement with field data (mean absolute error is 11 cm with 8.5 cm standard deviation) and average errors are lower than those obtained with other topography-based methods, where mean absolute error ranges from 47 cm for a model based on curvature, position, and slope gradient to 94 cm for a model based solely on slope gradient. As a further test, the predicted soil thickness was used to determine derived quantities, such as the factor of safety for landsliding potential. Our model, when compared to other empirical methods, returns the best results and, therefore, can improve the prediction of soil losses and sediment production when utilized in conjunction with hydrological and landsliding models.
机译:在缺少活跃的地貌过程(例如土壤侵蚀和滑坡)的地区,集水区模型常常因缺乏可靠的土壤深度空间估算方法而受到阻碍。在一个流域中,土壤厚度h可以根据许多不同且相互影响的因素而变化,例如基础岩性,气候,坡度,山坡曲率,上坡贡献面积和植被覆盖度,这使得h的分布估计具有挑战性,而且常常是不可靠的。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种将土壤厚度与坡度,水平和垂直坡度曲率以及山坡轮廓内的相对位置联系起来的替代方法。虽然与坡度和曲率的关系应反映出go石覆盖层的运动学稳定性,从而允许在平坦和凹入区域具有更大的土壤厚度,但距山from(或距谷底)的距离说明了土壤在后序中的位置。最后一个参数是基本参数;具有相同坡度和曲率的点由于沿山坡轮廓的位置不同而具有明显不同的土壤厚度。提议的模型已在地理信息系统环境中实施,并在意大利中部的Terzona Creek盆地进行了测试。结果与现场数据非常吻合(平均绝对误差为11 cm,标准偏差为8.5 cm),平均误差低于其他基于地形的方法所获得的平均值,对于基于曲率的模型,平均误差为47 cm ,位置和坡度梯度到94 cm(对于仅​​基于坡度梯度的模型)。作为进一步的测试,使用预测的土壤厚度来确定派生的数量,例如滑坡可能性的安全系数。与其他经验方法相比,我们的模型返回了最佳结果,因此,当与水文和滑坡模型结合使用时,可以改善对土壤流失和泥沙产生的预测。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water resources research》 |2010年第5期|P.W05508.1-W05508.15|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Earth Sciences, University of Firenze, Via La Pira 4, I-50121 Florence, Italy;

    rnDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Firenze, Via La Pira 4, I-50121 Florence, Italy;

    rnDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Firenze, Via La Pira 4, I-50121 Florence, Italy;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号