...
首页> 外文期刊>Water resources research >On the mechanism of field-scale solute transport: Insights from numerical simulations and field observations
【24h】

On the mechanism of field-scale solute transport: Insights from numerical simulations and field observations

机译:田间规模溶质运移的机理:数值模拟和现场观察的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Field-scale transport of conservative and reactive solutes through a deep vadose zone was analyzed by means of two different model processes for the local description of the transport. The first is the advection-dispersion equation (ADE) model, and the second is the mobile-immobile (MIM) model. The analyses were performed by means of three-dimensional (3-D), numerical simulations of flow and transport considering realistic features of the flow system, pertinent to a turf field irrigated with treated sewage effluents (TSE). Simulated water content and concentration profiles were compared with available measurements of their counterparts. Results of the analyses suggest that the behavior of both solutes in the deep vadose zone of the Glil Yam site is better quantified by the MIM model than by the ADE model. Reconstruction of the shape of the measured solute concentration profiles using the MIM model required relatively small mass transfer coefficient, γ, and relatively large volume fraction of the immobile water θ_(im). This implies that for an initially nonzero solute concentration profile, as compared with the MIM model, the ADE model may significantly overestimate the rate at which solutes are loaded in the groundwater. On the contrary, for an initially zero solute concentration profile, as compared with the MIM model, the ADE model may significantly underestimate solute velocities and early arrival times to the water table. These findings stem from the combination of relatively small γ and relatively large θ_(im) taken into account in the MIM model. In the first case, this combination forces a considerable portion of the solute mass to reside in the immobile region of the water-filled pore space, while the opposite is true in the second case.
机译:保守和反应性溶质通过深层渗流带的现场规模迁移,通过两种不同的模型过程进行了分析,以进行迁移的局部描述。第一个是对流扩散方程(ADE)模型,第二个是移动固定(MIM)模型。分析是通过三维(3-D)流量和运输的数值模拟进行的,其中考虑了与实际灌溉系统相关的,涉及灌溉污水处理场(TSE)的草皮场的实际特征。将模拟的水含量和浓度曲线与它们对应的可用测量值进行比较。分析结果表明,MIL模型比ADE模型更好地量化了Glil Yam部位深层渗流区中两种溶质的行为。使用MIM模型重建测得的溶质浓度曲线的形状需要相对较小的传质系数γ和相对较大的固定水θ_(im)体积分数。这意味着,与MIM模型相比,对于最初非零的溶质浓度曲线,ADE模型可能会大大高估地下水中溶质的加载速率。相反,对于初始为零的溶质浓度曲线,与MIM模型相比,ADE模型可能会大大低估溶质速度和到地下水位的提前到达时间。这些发现源于在MIM模型中考虑的相对较小的γ和相对较大的θ_(im)的组合。在第一种情况下,这种结合迫使大量的溶质停留在充满水的孔隙空间的不动区域中,而在第二种情况下则相反。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water resources research》 |2014年第9期|7484-7504|共21页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Environmental Physics and Irrigation, Agriculture Research Organization, Bet Dagan, Israel;

    Department of Environmental Physics and Irrigation, Agriculture Research Organization, Bet Dagan, Israel;

    Department of Soil Chemistry, Plant Nutrition and Microbiology, Agriculture Research Organization, Bet Dagan, Israel;

    Department of Environmental Hydrology and Microbiology, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel;

    Department of Environmental Hydrology and Microbiology, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel;

    Department of Environmental Hydrology and Microbiology, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号