首页> 外文期刊>Water resources research >Comment on 'Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?' by Christopher Hutton et al.: Let hydrologists learn the latest computer science by working with Research Software Engineers (RSEs) and not reinvent the waterwheel ourselves
【24h】

Comment on 'Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?' by Christopher Hutton et al.: Let hydrologists learn the latest computer science by working with Research Software Engineers (RSEs) and not reinvent the waterwheel ourselves

机译:评论“大多数计算水文学是不可复制的,真的是科学吗?” Christopher Hutton等人撰写:让水文学家与研究软件工程师(RSE)一起学习最新的计算机科学,而不是自己重新发明水车

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The suggestions by Hutton et al. might not be enough to guarantee reproducible computational hydrology. Archiving software code and research data alone will not be enough. We add to the suggestion of Hutton et al. that hydrologists not only document their (computer) work, but that hydrologists use the latest best practices in designing research software, most notably the use of containers and open interfaces. To make sure hydrologists know of these best practices, we urge close collaboration with Research Software Engineers (RSEs).
机译:Hutton等人的建议。可能不足以保证可重复的计算水文学。仅归档软件代码和研究数据是不够的。我们增加了赫顿等人的建议。水文学家不仅记录他们的(计算机)工作,而且水文学家在设计研究软件时使用最新的最佳实践,尤其是容器和开放式接口的使用。为确保水文学家了解这些最佳做法,我们敦促与研究软件工程师(RSE)紧密合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号