首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Assessment of AquaCrop Model in Simulating Sugar Beet Canopy Cover, Biomass and Root Yield under Different Irrigation and Field Management Practices in Semi-Arid Regions of Pakistan
【24h】

Assessment of AquaCrop Model in Simulating Sugar Beet Canopy Cover, Biomass and Root Yield under Different Irrigation and Field Management Practices in Semi-Arid Regions of Pakistan

机译:巴基斯坦半干旱地区不同灌溉和田间管理措施对甜菜冠层覆盖,生物量和根系产量的AquaCrop模型评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The AquaCrop model was analyzed for simulating sugar beet crop production under four irrigation regimes, three mulching conditions and three furrow irrigation systems in semiarid region of Pakistan. Irrigation regimes were full irrigation (FI), 20% deficit irrigation (DI20), 40% deficit irrigation (DI40) and 60% deficit irrigation (DI60). The mulching practices were No-mulch (NM), black film mulch (BFM) and straw mulch (SM). The furrow irrigation systems were conventional ridge-furrow (CRF) system, medium raised-bed (MRB) system and wide raised-bed (WRB) system. The model was calibrated and validated using the independent data sets of full irrigation and deficit irrigation regimes collected during 2011-12 cropping season. The model performance was evaluated by using different statistical indicators such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), index of agreement (dindex), and NashSutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). These indicators showed that the model fairly simulated sugar beet canopy cover for all treatments with 3.00 <= RMSE <= 16.89, 0.84 <= d(index) <= 0.97, and 0.76 <= NSE <= 0.99. For biomass and root yield, the model performance was excellent under all full irrigation (FI) and mild deficit irrigation (DI20) treatments with RMSE ranged between 0.07 and 1.17, dindex between 0.48 and 0.84, and NSE between 0.42 and 0.86, respectively. However the low values of dindex (0.10 and 0.13) and NSE (-69.32 and -30.63) showed that the model overestimated both the biomass and root yield when 20% deficit irrigation was applied without mulch in WRB system. The model also over estimated the yield and biomass when 40% deficit irrigation was applied in CRF system. The highest overestimation (d(index): 0.10 to 0.11; NSE: -50.92 to -70.55) was observed when highest stress level (DI60) was applied in the presence of BFM in CRF system. Based on the model's overall performance, the AquaCrop application is recommended for developing efficient farm water management strategies in the semi-arid regions.
机译:分析了AquaCrop模型,以模拟巴基斯坦半干旱地区在四种灌溉制度,三种覆盖条件和三种犁沟灌溉系统下的甜菜作物生产。灌溉制度为完全灌溉(FI),20%亏缺灌溉(DI20),40%亏缺灌溉(DI40)和60%亏缺灌溉(DI60)。地膜覆盖方式为不覆盖(NM),黑膜覆盖(BFM)和稻草覆盖(SM)。沟灌系统是常规的垄沟(CRF)系统,中型高床(MRB)系统和宽高床(WRB)系统。使用在2011-12种植季节收集的完全灌溉和亏缺灌溉制度的独立数据集,对模型进行了校准和验证。通过使用不同的统计指标(例如均方根误差(RMSE),一致性指数(dindex)和NashSutcliffe效率(NSE))评估模型的性能。这些指标表明,该模型对3.00 <= RMSE <= 16.89、0.84 <= d(指数)<= 0.97和0.76 <= NSE <= 0.99的所有处理均公平地模拟了甜菜冠层的覆盖度。对于生物量和根系产量,在所有全灌(FI)和轻度亏缺灌溉(DI20)处理下,RMSE介于0.07和1.17,dindex介于0.48和0.84之间,NSE介于0.42和0.86之间,模型性能非常好。但是,dindex(0.10和0.13)和NSE(-69.32和-30.63)的低值表明,在WRB系统中不覆盖地膜施用20%亏缺灌溉时,该模型高估了生物量和根系产量。当在CRF系统中使用40%的亏水灌溉时,该模型还高估了产量和生物量。当在CRF系统中存在BFM的情况下施加最高应力水平(DI60)时,观察到最高的高估(d(指数):0.10至0.11; NSE:-50.92至-70.55)。根据模型的整体性能,建议使用AquaCrop应用程序在半干旱地区开发有效的农场用水管理策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号