首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA): an Ex-Post Analysis of Water Services by the Legal Review in Portugal
【24h】

Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA): an Ex-Post Analysis of Water Services by the Legal Review in Portugal

机译:监管影响评估(RIA):葡萄牙法律审​​查对水服务的事后分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper adopts an ex-post regulatory impact assessment (RIA) to analyze the effects of Law no.194/2009 on public-private partnerships (PPP) in the water sector in Portugal. Although the water services have been improving concerning coverage and safety since 1990, any change in regulation can have both "positive and negative" consequences either for customers, providers or local governments. This context can provide the opportunity to observe a national experiment of regulatory reform and assess its outcomes based on the following multiple targets: (i) customer protection; (ii) governance; (iii) financial, infrastructure and operational sustainability; and (iv) environmental improvement. To evaluate the impact of this legal reform, three steps were considered: (i) the status quo, scenarios and perspective; (ii) assessment; and (iii) consultation. Additionally, two aid methods were used: (i) expert opinions (Delphi) and (ii) multicriteria decision modelling method (TOPSIS) based on similarity distance to ideal solution. In fact, Law no.194/2009 reduced the gap in terms of performance between the concessions, but amplified the contrasts when all perspectives are compared. Regarding policy objectives, the major gap to overcome in a possible review of this legal framework is linked to the "economic-financial, operational and infrastructural sustainability objective". Failures in any of these aspects can result in an ongoing PPP not meeting customer, municipality and concessionaire's expectations.
机译:本文采用事后监管影响评估(RIA),以分析第194/2009号法律对葡萄牙水务部门中公私合营伙伴关系(PPP)的影响。尽管自1990年以来供水服务在覆盖范围和安全性方面一直在改善,但是任何法规变更对客户,提供者或地方政府都可能产生“积极和消极”的后果。这种情况可以为观察国家监管改革试验并根据以下多个目标评估其结果提供机会:(i)保护客户; (ii)治理; (iii)财务,基础设施和运营的可持续性; (iv)改善环境。为了评估这项法律改革的影响,考虑了三个步骤:(i)现状,设想方案和观点; (ii)评估; (iii)咨询。另外,使用了两种辅助方法:(i)专家意见(Delphi)和(ii)基于与理想解决方案的相似距离的多准则决策建模方法(TOPSIS)。实际上,第194/2009号法律缩小了特许权之间在绩效方面的差距,但在比较所有观点时扩大了对比。关于政策目标,在可能的审查这一法律框架中要克服的主要差距与“经济,金融,业务和基础设施的可持续性目标”有关。这些方面中的任何一个失败都可能导致正在进行的PPP无法满足客户,市政当局和特许公司的期望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号