首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Examination of Various Feature Selection Approaches for Daily Precipitation Downscaling in Different Climates
【24h】

Examination of Various Feature Selection Approaches for Daily Precipitation Downscaling in Different Climates

机译:在不同气候下的日降水尺寸下进行各种特征选择方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

To turn General Circulation Models (GCMs) projection toward better assessment, it is crucial to employ a downscaling process to get more reliability of their outputs. The data-driven based downscaling techniques recently have been used widely, and predictor selection is usually considered as the main challenge in these methods. Hence, this study aims to examine the most common approaches of feature selection in the downscaling of daily rainfall in two different climates in Iran. So, the measured daily rainfall and National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) predictors were collected, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) was considered as downscaling methods. Also, a complete set of comparative tests considering all dimensions was employed to identify the best subset of predictors. Results indicated that the skill of various selection methods in different tests is significantly different. Despite a few partial superiorities viewed between selection models, they not presented an obvious distinction. However, regarding all related factors, it may be deduced that the Stepwise Regression Analysis (SRA) and Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) are better than others. Also, the finding of this study showed that there are some weaknesses in the interpretation of SRA, so concerning this issue, it may be concluded that BMA has more reliable performance. Furthermore, results indicated that generally, the downscaling procedure has more accuracy in arid climate than cold-semi arid climate.
机译:要将普通循环模型(GCMS)投影转向更好的评估,对于采用次要流程来获得其输出的更可靠性至关重要。最近已经广泛使用的基于数据驱动的缩小技术,并且预测器选择通常被认为是这些方法中的主要挑战。因此,本研究旨在审查伊朗两次不同气候日落的较次测量中的特征选择的最常见方法。因此,收集了测量的日落和环境预测/国家大气研究中心的国家中心(NCEP / NCAR)预测器,并将支持向量机(SVM)视为较低的方法。此外,考虑所有尺寸的完整比较测试,以识别预测器的最佳子集。结果表明,不同测试中各种选择方法的技能显着不同。尽管选择模型之间观看了一些部分优势,但它们并未显示出明显的区别。然而,关于所有相关因素,可能推断出逐步回归分析(SRA)和贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)比其他因素更好。此外,这项研究的发现表明,SRA的解释存在一些缺点,所以关于这个问题,可以得出结论,BMA具有更可靠的性能。此外,结果表明,通常,缩小程序在干旱地区具有比冷半干旱气候更高的精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号