...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Identifying the Relationship between Assignments of Scenario Weights and their Positions in the Derivation of Reservoir Operating Rules under Climate Change
【24h】

Identifying the Relationship between Assignments of Scenario Weights and their Positions in the Derivation of Reservoir Operating Rules under Climate Change

机译:确定情景权重分配与其在气候变化下水库运行规则推导中的位置之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In order to mitigate the adverse impacts of climate change, adaptive operating rules (AOR) are generally derived using an ensemble of General Circulation Models (GCMs). Up to date, most of related literatures only focus on one fold of the following issues concerning the derivation of AOR using the GCMs ensemble, including: (1) consideration of different scenario weighing methods, or (2) analysis of different positions to locate scenario weights. And less concern is given to the latter compared with the former. However, few studies identify the relationship between (1) and (2) in the derivation of AOR based on the GCMs ensemble. In this study, we attempt to investigate where to use Equal and REA scenario weights in the derivation of reservoir operating rules under climate change. Equal weights (EW) and unequal weights based on the reliability ensemble average (REA) method are used in two positions: (I) the optimization objective of the reservoir operation model, which is to maximize the weighted average hydropower generation for all future scenarios; and (II) the incorporation of GCMs ensemble climate projections into the weighted climate conditions, and then it is input into the reservoir operation model with the objective of maximizing annual hydropower generation. Four AORs, including EW-AOR(I), REA-AOR(I), EW-AOR(II) and REA-AOR(II), are derived, and their optimized parameters are obtained by the simulation-based optimization (SBO) method with the Complex algorithm. The case study in the Jinxi Reservoir in China indicates that REA-AOR(I) outperforms the other three operation schemes, and EW-AOR(II) performs better than REA-AOR(II). Therefore, equal weights are preferably used to incorporate climate conditions, while unequal weights based on REA method can improve the performance of the reservoir operation model. Generally, REA-AOR(I) and EW-AOR(II) are suggested for adaptive reservoir management under climate change.
机译:为了减轻气候变化的不利影响,通常使用通用流通模型(GCM)集合得出自适应运行规则(AOR)。迄今为止,大多数相关文献仅关注以下有关使用GCM集合进行AOR推导的问题中的一个,包括:(1)考虑不同的方案权重方法,或(2)分析不同的位置以定位方案重量。与前者相比,对后者的关注较少。然而,很少有研究在基于GCM集合的AOR推导中确定(1)和(2)之间的关系。在本研究中,我们尝试研究在气候变化下水库运行规则推导中,应在何处使用等重和REA情景权重。基于可靠性集成平均法(REA)的等权重(EW)和不等权重被用于两个位置:(I)水库运行模型的优化目标,这是在所有未来方案中最大化加权平均水力发电; (II)将GCM的整体气候预测纳入加权气候条件,然后将其输入到水库运行模型中,以期使年发电量最大化。导出了四个AOR,包括EW-AOR(I),REA-AOR(I),EW-AOR(II)和REA-AOR(II),并通过基于仿真的优化(SBO)获得了它们的优化参数。复杂算法的方法。中国金溪水库的案例研究表明,REA-AOR(I)的性能优于其他三种运行方案,而EW-AOR(II)的性能优于REA-AOR(II)。因此,最好使用相等的权重合并气候条件,而基于REA方法的不相等的权重可以改善油藏运行模型的性能。通常,建议将REA-AOR(I)和EW-AOR(II)用于气候变化下的适应性储层管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号