...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Environmental Flows Under the WFD Implementation
【24h】

Environmental Flows Under the WFD Implementation

机译:WFD实施中的环境流量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) is the first piece of European environmental legislation addressing hydromorphological modifications and impacts on water bodies. Accordingly, in those water bodies where the hydromorphological pressures are having an impact on the ecological status, action is needed to achieve WFD objectives. Environmental flows appeared as one of the answers to this challenge. Due to their importance, Member States (MSs) have been looking to integrate ecological flows in the River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) and Programmes of Measures (PoMs). More than seventeen years after the WFD adoption, this study aims to provide a systematic review of the use of environmental flows within the process of WFD implementation and their contribution to the achievement of environmental objectives. In order to achieve the goals of the study, a special analysis was done using: i) the WFD official documentation reporting the progress of WFD and environmental flows definition and implementation (such as the CIS Guidance n degrees 31), as well as, ii) the answers to key questions addressed to EU MSs representatives involved in the implementation of environmental flows. These enabled us to perceive how this topic has been addressed in MSs. Based on the gathered information the authors assessed whether a change in the environmental flows' situation, between the 1st and 2nd RBMPs, has occurred by each MS, or whether progress on environmental flows assessments has been made. Furthermore, this study also highlights some MSs representatives comments related with the role of the Guidance n degrees 31 and some relevant information related with the 3rd RBMPs. Even though an evolution on environmental flows assessments can be perceived, with an increase in MSs defining and incorporating environmental flows within the 2nd RBMPs and in the complexity of the conducted approaches, there is still a long way to go. Namely, it could be highlighted that more efforts are required for the: i) implementation of environmental flows and the monitoring of its effects in the water bodies status, ii) development of a verifiable link between environmental flows and biological indicators.
机译:《水框架指令》(WFD)是欧洲第一部解决水形态变化及其对水体影响的环境立法。因此,在水形压力影响生态状况的那些水体中,需要采取行动来实现WFD目标。环境流动似乎是应对这一挑战的答案之一。由于其重要性,会员国(MS)一直在寻求将生态流量纳入流域管理计划(RBMP)和措施计划(PoM)中。在《世界粮食日》通过后的十七年中,本研究旨在系统地审查世界粮食日在实施过程中对环境流量的使用及其对实现环境目标的贡献。为了实现研究目标,使用以下方法进行了特殊分析:i)WFD官方文件,报告了WFD和环境流量定义和实施的进度(例如CIS指南n级31),以及ii )针对涉及环境流程实施的欧盟成员国代表的关键问题的答案。这些使我们能够了解MS中如何解决此主题。根据收集到的信息,作者评估了每个MS在第一和第二RBMP之间是否发生了环境流量状况的变化,或者在环境流量评估方面是否取得了进展。此外,本研究还重点介绍了一些MS代表关于与n级指导31的作用有关的评论,以及与第三RBMP相关的一些相关信息。尽管可以感觉到环境流量评估的发展,但随着MS在第二次RBMP中定义和纳入环境流量的增加,以及实施方法的复杂性,还有很长的路要走。即,可以强调的是,在以下方面需要付出更多的努力:i)实施环境流量及其对水体状况的影响的监测,ii)在环境流量与生物指标之间建立可验证的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号