首页> 外文期刊>Water Resources Management >Selection of the Best Inland Waterway Structure: A Multicriteria Decision Analysis Approach
【24h】

Selection of the Best Inland Waterway Structure: A Multicriteria Decision Analysis Approach

机译:最佳内河航道结构选择:多准则决策分析方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study explains the role and effectiveness of Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approaches for decision support to rank the best option(s) to reconstruct and rehabilitate the inland waterway structure by demonstrating a case study of River Ilmenau in Germany. Considering the involvement of several stakeholders and community with the status and functionality of the Ilmenau river, this paper also considers the importance of stakeholder participation in the decision making process by an intensive stakeholder interview. A total of 27 criteria were selected that represent a wide range of environmental and socio-economic aspects of the Ilmenau River and the activities related to this river. The ranking of the alternatives were performed by combining AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) with PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment Evaluations) to achieve a rigorous solution of the objective. 23 stakeholders such as decision-makers, experts, and researchers from environmental, administrative, recreational, and socio-economical fields were interviewed to determine the criteria to be weighed. The stakeholders’ opinions showed ecological continuity is one of the most important criteria to be considered. They also gave significant importance to nature protection laws and directives. Among the socio-economic criteria, flood protection was the most important one. Removal of weirs and installation of ground ramps was suggested to be the best option to consider for further investigation and implementation. This study clearly demonstrates the importance of stakeholder and community participation to decision-making process and contributes new information, especially stakeholders’ attitude towards decision making for water resources infrastructure selection.
机译:这项研究通过对德国伊尔默瑙河的案例研究,说明了多准则决策分析(MCDA)方法在决策支持中的作用和有效性,从而为重建和修复内陆水道结构的最佳方案排名。考虑到多个利益相关者和社区对伊尔默瑙河的地位和功能的参与,本文还通过对利益相关者的深入访谈,考虑了利益相关者参与决策过程的重要性。总共选择了27条标准,这些标准代表了伊尔默瑙河及其相关活动的广泛环境和社会经济方面。通过将AHP(层次分析法)与PROMETHEE(用于富集评估的偏好排名组织METHod)相结合,对替代方案进行排名,以实现对目标的严格解决方案。采访了环境,行政,娱乐和社会经济领域的23位利益相关者,例如决策者,专家和研究人员,以确定权衡标准。利益相关者的意见表明,生态连续性是要考虑的最重要标准之一。他们还非常重视自然保护法律和指令。在社会经济标准中,防洪是最重要的标准。建议拆除堰和安装地面坡道是考虑进一步调查和实施的最佳选择。这项研究清楚地表明了利益相关者和社区参与对决策过程的重要性,并提供了新的信息,尤其是利益相关者对水资源基础设施选择决策的态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号