...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Research >Wastewater disinfection: long-term laboratory and full-scale studies on performic acid in comparison with peracetic acid and chlorine
【24h】

Wastewater disinfection: long-term laboratory and full-scale studies on performic acid in comparison with peracetic acid and chlorine

机译:废水消毒:与过乙酸和氯相比,长期实验室和对表演酸的全面研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chemical disinfection of municipal wastewater to preserve the microbiological quality of discharges has traditionally relied on chlorine, and more recently on peracetic acid (PAA). A more recent option is per -formic acid (PFA). This work uses laboratory and full-scale studies over a span of 15 years and five wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Italy, to compare the efficacy of these three disinfectants and identify the differences among peracids in a context where both can be an alternative to chlorine. The investigations focused on treatment effectiveness and bacterial inactivation kinetics using E. coli and the more resistant enterococci, as well as on PFA and PAA decomposition as the residuals may affect the downstream microenvironment. Furthermore, the potential for the two peracids to oxidize organic substances and create troublesome byproducts was also studied. Chlorine, applied as hypochlorite ("HYP") and here essentially functioning as chloramines, was used as a baseline comparison for the two peracids. Appropriate statistical tests were applied to the data from different WWTPs to account for potential interferences and compounding effects of the different matrices. Average doses of 0.8, 2.9 and 1.4 mg/L and contact times of 18, 21 and 31 min, respectively for PFA, chlorine and PAA guaranteed with a high level of assurance the 50 0 0 CFU/100mL E. coli limit; the order of effectiveness was PFA HYP PAA, refined as PFA HYP approximate to PAA against E. coli and PFA approximate to HYP PAA with enterococci. Similar bacterial reductions for the peracids were found at higher disinfectant doses used for the kinetic tests. PFA decayed more quickly than PAA. The first-order decay constants were 0.031 and 0.007 min -1, respectively, suggesting that disinfection residuals when PFA is used may be less of a concern than with PAA. This faster decomposition did not affect the PFA oxidation power on estrone, which was as weak as that of PAA. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:市政废水的化学消毒,以保留微生物质量的排放量传统上依赖于氯,最近在过乙酸(PAA)上。最近的选择是每种食谱(PFA)。这项工作采用了在15年的跨度和意大利的五个废水处理厂(WWTPS)的实验室和全尺寸研究,以比较这三种消毒剂的疗效,并在既可以是替代方案的背景下鉴定哌酸之间的差异氯。使用大肠杆菌和更耐肠细胞的治疗效果和细菌灭活动力学的研究以及随着残留物的抗性肠球菌和PAA分解的研究可能影响下游微环境。此外,还研究了两种寄生物氧化有机物质并产生麻烦副产物的潜力。作为次氯酸盐(“百下)”)和本文基本上用作氯胺的氯作为两种过酸的基线比较。将适当的统计测试应用于来自不同WWTP的数据,以考虑不同基质的潜在干扰和复合效应。平均剂量为0.8,2.9和1.4 mg / L和接触时间为18,21和31分钟,分别用于PFA,氯和PAA,保证高水平保证50 0 0 CFU / 100ml大肠杆菌限制;有效性的顺序是PFA>百下PAA,精制为PFA> Hyp近似与对大肠杆菌和PFA的PAA近似与肠球菌的Hyp> Paa近似。在用于动力学试验的较高消毒剂量下发现类似的细菌减少。 PFA比PAA更快地腐烂。一阶衰减常数分别为0.031和0.007 min -1,表明当使用PFA时,消毒残留可能较少,而不是PAA。这种更快的分解不会影响雌激素的PFA氧化力,这与PAA一样弱。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号