...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Research >Embodied energy comparison of surface water and groundwater supply options
【24h】

Embodied energy comparison of surface water and groundwater supply options

机译:地表水和地下水供应方案的具体能源比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The embodied energy associated with water provision comprises an important part of water management, and is important when considering sustainability. In this study, an input-output based hybrid analysis integrated with structural path analysis was used to develop an embodied energy model. The model was applied to a groundwater supply system (Kalamazoo, Michigan) and a surface water supply system (Tampa, Florida). The two systems evaluated have comparable total energy embodiments based on unit water production. However, the onsite energy use of the groundwater supply system is approximately 27% greater than the surface water supply system. This was primarily due to more extensive pumping requirements. On the other hand, the groundwater system uses approximately 31% less indirect energy than the surface water system, mainly because of fewer chemicals used for treatment. The results from this and other studies were also compiled to provide a relative comparison of embodied energy for major water supply options.
机译:与水供应相关的体现的能量是水管理的重要组成部分,在考虑可持续性时很重要。在这项研究中,基于输入-输出的混合分析与结构路径分析相结合,用于开发具体化的能量模型。该模型已应用于地下水供应系统(密歇根州卡拉马祖)和地表供水系统(佛罗里达州坦帕)。评估的两个系统具有基于单位水产量的可比较的总能量实施方案。但是,地下水供应系统的现场能耗比地表供水系统高约27%。这主要是由于更广泛的泵送要求。另一方面,地下水系统比地表水系统使用的间接能量大约少31%,这主要是因为用于处理的化学物质较少。还汇总了这项研究和其他研究的结果,以相对比较主要供水方案所包含的能量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号