...
首页> 外文期刊>Water Policy >Water pricing and full cost recovery of water services: economic incentive or instrument of public finance?
【24h】

Water pricing and full cost recovery of water services: economic incentive or instrument of public finance?

机译:水价和水服务的全部成本回收:经济激励还是公共财政手段?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Neoclassical economists have advocated the use of pricing instruments as a fundamental tool for achieving sustainability of water systems and an efficient allocation of water resources. This idea has been accepted in worldwide agreed definitions of sustainability, where "full-cost recovery" is considered as a basic requirement. In this paper, we argue that water pricing (aiming at allocative objectives) and cost recovery can often be at odds, while prevalence of one or the other objective also depends on whether the main issue at stake is financing infrastructure development and maintenance, or rather allocating scarce water resources. Therefore, the two issues should be dealt with separately and require different approaches to pricing.
机译:新古典经济学家提倡使用定价工具作为实现水系统可持续性和有效分配水资源的基本工具。这个想法已被全球公认的可持续性定义所接受,其中“全额成本回收”被视为基本要求。在本文中,我们认为水价(针对分配目标)和成本回收通常是矛盾的,而一个或另一个目标的普遍性还取决于所涉及的主要问题是为基础设施开发和维护提供资金,还是分配稀缺的水资源。因此,这两个问题应分开处理,并要求采用不同的定价方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号