首页> 外文期刊>Water Policy >Match, don't mix: implications of institutional and technical service modalities for water governance outcomes in south Indian small towns
【24h】

Match, don't mix: implications of institutional and technical service modalities for water governance outcomes in south Indian small towns

机译:匹配,不要混淆:机构和技术服务模式对印度南部小城镇水治理成果的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper seeks to contribute to the limited literature on water governance in small towns in India. For assessing water governance, we propose a broad framework encompassing adequacy and affordability, equity, sustainability and responsiveness. Analytically, the concept of 'service modality' is expanded to include not only institutional arrangements but also water resource deployment, and placed within a framework that includes multiple contextual variables as well. We use this framework to carry out an inductive analysis by comparing water service delivery and governance in four small towns across two states (Karnataka and Tamil Nadu) in southern India. Apart from differences in size, the towns differ in the institutional arrangements - from fully municipal management to a combination to complete para-statal management - and in the deployment of water resources - only ground water to a mixed supply of ground and surface water (dual sourcing). Data were gathered using a combination of household surveys, metering, records, and interviews. Dual sourcing resulted in adequate supply and optimization vis-a-vis end uses. Inter-household inequity is driven by socio-economic differences amongst households, but can be mitigated to an extent by increasing public tap density. But water resource use is not physically or financially sustainable. The responsiveness to citizen needs was significantly higher when the distribution was done by the local governments. Separation of roles, with para-statals providing bulk supply of surface water, and local governments managing the distribution of this and groundwater, may be an optimal service modality.
机译:本文旨在为印度小城镇关于水治理的有限文献做出贡献。为了评估水治理,我们提出了一个广泛的框架,其中包括充足性和可承受性,公平性,可持续性和响应能力。从分析上讲,“服务方式”的概念已扩展到不仅包括机构安排,而且还包括水资源部署,并被放置在一个包含多个上下文变量的框架内。通过比较印度南部两个州(卡纳塔克邦和泰米尔纳德邦)四个小镇的供水服务和治理情况,我们使用该框架进行归纳分析。除了规模上的差异外,城镇的体制安排也有所不同-从完全的市政管理到合并再到完整的半官方管理-以及水资源的配置-仅地下水到地下水和地表水的混合供应(双重)采购)。数据是结合家庭调查,计量,记录和访谈收集的。双重采购导致针对最终用途的充足供应和优化。家庭之间的不平等是由家庭之间的社会经济差异驱动的,但是可以通过增加公共水龙头密度在一定程度上缓解这种不平等。但是水资源的使用在物理上或财务上都不可持续。当由地方政府进行分配时,对公民需求的响应能力大大提高。以半官方机构提供地表水的大量供应以及由地方政府管理地下水和地下水的分配的角色分离可能是最佳的服务方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号