首页> 外文期刊>Water policy report >Top Official, Industry Lawyer Battle Over Need For CWA Jurisdiction Rule
【24h】

Top Official, Industry Lawyer Battle Over Need For CWA Jurisdiction Rule

机译:行业律师就CWA管辖权规则的需要进行的高级官员之争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Administration and industry officials are battling over whether regulators need the pending rule clarifying the reach of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to bring enforcement actions against "midnight" dumpers of pollutants in small headwaters upstream of jurisdictional waters. Speaking during the May 22 Environmental Law Institute (ELI) panel discussion, "Will the new waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) Rule float?" Lance Wood, assistant chief counsel with the Army Corps of Engineers' environmental law and regulatory programs, said the existing confusion over the scope of the water law hinders prosecution of polluters for discharges into small tributaries connected to larger downstream waterbodies, in other words "inviting midnight dumpers." Wood, who was speaking as an individual and not on behalf of the Corps, cited as an example a 1997 ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in U.S. v. Eidson, in which the court upheld a conviction for discharges of sludge into a Florida drainage ditch that eventually flowed into Tampa Bay tributaries.
机译:政府和行业官员正在就监管机构是否需要等待中的规则进行澄清,以澄清《清洁水法》(CWA)的适用范围,以便对管辖水域上游小水源中的“午夜”污染物倾倒者采取执法行动。在5月22日的环境法协会(ELI)小组讨论中,“美国(WOTUS)规则的新领域会浮起吗?”陆军工程兵团环境法和法规计划的助理首席法律顾问兰斯·伍德说,目前对水法范围的困惑阻碍了对排污者的起诉,以排入与较大下游水体相连的小型支流,换句话说“邀请午夜倾销者。”伍德以个人身份而不是军团名义发言,以1997年美国诉第11巡回法院美国上诉法院对Eidson案的判决为例,该法院维持对释放污泥的定罪判决。流入佛罗里达的排水沟,最终流入坦帕湾支流。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water policy report》 |2014年第11期|5-6|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号