首页> 外文OA文献 >An English jurisdiction clause does battle with Canadian legislation similar to the Hamburg Rules
【2h】

An English jurisdiction clause does battle with Canadian legislation similar to the Hamburg Rules

机译:英国司法管辖权条款与加拿大法律类似,与汉堡规则类似

摘要

Analyses the Court of Appeal judgment in OT Africa Line Ltd v Magic Sportswear Corp on whether an English exclusive jurisdiction clause in a bill of lading took priority to the Canadian Marine Liability Act 2001 s.46. Reviews the European Court of Justice ruling in Owusu v Jackson (t/a Villa Holidays Bal Inn Villas) (C-281/02) on jurisdiction under Council Regulation 44/2001 Art.23 where a party was domiciled in a Member State.
机译:就OT Africa Line Ltd诉Magic Sportswear Corp案中的上诉法院的判决进行分析,以分析提单中的英国专属管辖权条款是否优先于2001年加拿大海洋责任法第46条。审查欧洲法院在Owusu诉Jackson案(t / a Villa Holidays Bal Inn Villas)(C-281 / 02)中关于理事会第44/2001条第23条所管辖的管辖权的裁决,该当事方的住所为成员国。

著录项

  • 作者

    Baatz Yvonne;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号