...
首页> 外文期刊>Water policy report >4th Circuit To Weigh Scope Of EPA's Nondiscretionary Duty Under CWA
【24h】

4th Circuit To Weigh Scope Of EPA's Nondiscretionary Duty Under CWA

机译:根据CWA衡量EPA的非酌定职责范围的第四个电路

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A federal appeals court is poised to consider later this month whether the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires EPA to approve changes to a state's water quality standards after the agency indicates support for state efforts while the standards are being developed - a position urged by a West Virginia wastewater utility but which a lower court rejected. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit is scheduled to hear oral argument Jan. 29 in Sanitary Board of the City of Charleston, WV(CSB) v. Andrew Wheeler, where the board is asking the court to reverse a pair of rulings from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia that upheld EPA's rejection of a site-specific copper standard. At the heart of the litigation is CSB's desire for site-specific copper water quality criteria that would result in less stringent discharge limits for the municipal wastewater treatment plant. West Virginia's water quality standards regulation allows the default copper criteria to be tailored to local water quality conditions by conducting a Water Effect Ratio (WER) study, and CSB worked with the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to develop such criteria for the Kanawha River. During the development of the site-specific criteria, EPA informed the state that it appeared it was using the right calculations. CSB maintains this means EPA approved of the process West Virginia was using and was then required to approve the subsequent final criteria. CSB initially filed suit to force EPA to act on West Virginia's submission of the new criteria, citing a 60-day deadline for action in the CWA. When EPA rejected the criteria during the course of the litigation, and West Virginia issued a new discharge permit that contained no copper limits, the district court ruled the deadline claims were moot. CSB then amended its suit to claim the disapproval violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), but the court dismissed the APA claims without reaching their merits.
机译:联邦上诉法院准备在本月晚些时候考虑《清洁水法》(CWA)是否要求EPA批准对州水质标准的更改,因为该机构表示正在支持州标准制定过程中的努力。西弗吉尼亚州的污水处理厂,但被下级法院驳回。美国第四巡回上诉法院定于1月29日在查尔斯顿市卫生局WV(CSB)诉安德鲁·惠勒(Andrew Wheeler)案中听取口头辩论,该委员会正在要求法院推翻以下两项裁决:美国西弗吉尼亚州南区地方法院维持了EPA拒绝特定地点的铜标准的主张。诉讼的核心是CSB对特定地点的铜水质标准的需求,这将导致市政废水处理厂的排放限制降低。西弗吉尼亚州的水质标准法规允许通过进行水效应比(WER)研究来调整默认铜标准以适合当地水质条件,CSB与西弗吉尼亚州环境保护部(DEP)合作为此类标准制定此类标准。卡纳瓦哈河。在制定针对特定地点的标准期间,EPA告知该州它似乎正在使用正确的计算方法。 CSB坚持认为,这意味着EPA批准了西弗吉尼亚州正在使用的流程,然后需要其批准后续的最终标准。 CSB最初提起诉讼,以迫使EPA根据西弗吉尼亚州提交的新标准采取行动,理由是CWA的行动期限为60天。当EPA在诉讼过程中拒绝了该标准,并且西弗吉尼亚州签发了一份新的排放许可证,其中没有铜的限制,地方法院裁定最后期限的索赔没有意义。随后,CSB修改了其诉讼,声称该拒登违反了《行政程序法》(APA),但法院在没有充分依据的情况下驳回了APA的要求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water policy report》 |2019年第2期|19-20|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号