首页> 外文期刊>Water policy report >States' Bid To Scrap 2015 CWA Rule Echoes Kavanaugh Test For EPA Rules
【24h】

States' Bid To Scrap 2015 CWA Rule Echoes Kavanaugh Test For EPA Rules

机译:美国竞标废除2015年CWA规则,卡瓦诺测试呼应EPA规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Three GOP-led states are asking a federal district court to scrap the Obama-era Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction rule due to a lack of "clear" authorization from Congress for the policy, a claim that echoes Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's preferred test for reviewing major agency rules and could bolster their suit if it reaches the high court. The Oct. 18 summary judgment brief filed by Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas is the first substantive brief in a CWA jurisdiction suit since Kavanaugh's confirmation on Oct. 6, and incorporates a line of argument that the newly confirmed justice - previously a federal appeals court judge - focused on in testimony to Congress as a centerpiece of his judicial philosophy. Relevant documents are available on InsideEPA.com. (Doc. ID: 216146) That principle at issue is the doctrine that agencies cannot undertake "major" new rules, especially when they would significantly expand their authority, without clear authorization to do so in statutory text.
机译:由共和党领导的三个州要求联邦地方法院取消奥巴马时代的《清洁水法》(CWA)管辖权规定,原因是国会对该政策缺乏“明确”授权,这一主张与最高法院大法官布雷特相呼应卡瓦诺(Kavanaugh)对于审查主要代理规则的首选测试,如果达到高等法院,可能会提起诉讼。由得克萨斯州,路易斯安那州和密西西比州于10月18日向美国德克萨斯州南区地方法院提交的简易判决摘要是自Kavanaugh于10月6日确认以来在CWA管辖权诉讼中的第一项实质性摘要,并纳入了以下论点:新近确认的法官-以前是联邦上诉法院法官-专注于向国会作证,这是他的司法理念的核心。有关文件可在InsideEPA.com上找到。 (文档ID:216146)存在争议的原则是,代理机构不能采用“主要”新规则,特别是当它们未经法定文本明确授权而显着扩大其权限时,尤其如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号