首页> 外文期刊>Water and Environment Journal >Industry views on water resources planning methods - prospects for change in England and Wales
【24h】

Industry views on water resources planning methods - prospects for change in England and Wales

机译:业界对水资源规划方法的看法-英格兰和威尔士的变化前景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper describes a qualitative study of practitioner perspectives on regulated water resources planning practice in England and Wales. The study focuses on strengths and weaknesses of existing practice and the case for change towards a risk-based approach informed by stochastic modelling assessments. In-depth, structured interviews were conducted to capture the views of planners, regulators and consultants closely involved in the planning process. We found broad agreement that the existing water availability assessment methods are fallible; they lack transparency, are often highly subjective and may fail to adequately expose problems of resilience. While most practitioners believe these issues warrant a more detailed examination of risk in the planning process, few believe there is a strong case for a fundamental shift towards risk-based planning informed by stochastic modelling assessments. The study identifies perceived business risks associated with change and exposes widespread scepticism of stochastic methods.
机译:本文描述了从业人员对英格兰和威尔士受监管的水资源规划实践的观点的定性研究。这项研究的重点是现有做法的优缺点,以及在随机建模评估的指导下向基于风险的方法转变的理由。进行了深入,结构化的采访,以捕捉与计划过程密切相关的计划者,监管者和顾问的观点。我们发现广泛的共识是,现有的水资源评估方法是容易犯错的。它们缺乏透明度,通常具有很高的主观性,并且可能无法充分揭示弹性问题。虽然大多数从业人员认为这些问题需要在计划过程中对风险进行更详细的检查,但很少有人认为有充分的理由认为需要通过随机建模评估从根本上转向基于风险的计划。该研究确定了与变化相关的可感知的业务风险,并揭露了对随机方法的普遍怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号