...
首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Environmental performance of construction waste: Comparing three scenarios from a case study in Catalonia, Spain
【24h】

Environmental performance of construction waste: Comparing three scenarios from a case study in Catalonia, Spain

机译:建筑垃圾的环境绩效:西班牙加泰罗尼亚案例研究中的三种情景比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The main objective of this paper is to evaluate environmental impacts of construction wastes in terms of the LIFE 98 ENV/E/351 project. Construction wastes are classified in accordance with the Life Program Environment Directive of the European Commission. Three different scenarios to current waste management from a case study in Catalonia (Spain) have been compared: landfilling, recycling and incineration, and these scenarios were evaluated by means of Life Cycle Assessment. The recommendations of the Catalan Waste Catalogue and the European Waste Catalogue have been taken into account. Also, the influence of transport has been evaluated.rnResults show that in terms of the Global Warming Potential, the most environmentally friendly treatment was recycling, followed by incineration and lastly landfilling. According to the influence of treatment plants location on the CWP indicator, we observe that incineration and recycling of construction wastes are better than landfilling, even for long distances from the building site to the plants. This is true for most wastes except for the stony types, than should be recycled close to the building site.rnIn summary, data from construction waste of a Catalan case study was evaluated using the well established method of LCA to determine the environmental impacts.
机译:本文的主要目的是根据LIFE 98 ENV / E / 351项目评估建筑垃圾对环境的影响。建筑垃圾根据欧盟委员会的《生活计划环境指令》进行分类。比较了来自加泰罗尼亚(西班牙)的案例研究中当前废物管理的三种不同方案:垃圾填埋,回收和焚化,并通过生命周期评估对这些方案进行了评估。已考虑到加泰罗尼亚废物目录和欧洲废物目录的建议。此外,还评估了运输的影响。结果表明,就全球变暖潜势而言,最环保的处理方法是回收利用,然后进行焚烧,最后进行填埋。根据污水处理厂位置对CWP指标的影响,我们观察到,即使从建筑工地到污水处理厂的距离较长,焚烧和回收建筑废料也比填埋更好。除石质类型外,大多数废物都是如此,应在建筑工地附近进行回收。总之,加泰罗尼亚案例研究的建筑废物数据已使用完善的LCA方法进行了评估,以确定对环境的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management 》 |2010年第4期| 646-654| 共9页
  • 作者单位

    Rovira i Virgili University, Environmental Analysis and Management Croup (AGA), Chemical Engineering Department, Av. Paiesos Catalans 26, 43007, Tarragona, Spain University of Pamplona, Department of Industrial Engineering, Km 1 Via Bucaramanga, Pamplona, N de S, Colombia;

    rnRovira i Virgili University, Environmental Analysis and Management Croup (AGA), Chemical Engineering Department, Av. Paiesos Catalans 26, 43007, Tarragona, Spain;

    rnRovira i Virgili University, Environmental Analysis and Management Croup (AGA), Chemical Engineering Department, Av. Paiesos Catalans 26, 43007, Tarragona, Spain;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号