首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Environmental impact assessment of leachate recirculation in landfill of municipal solid waste by comparing with evaporation and discharge (EASEWASTE)
【24h】

Environmental impact assessment of leachate recirculation in landfill of municipal solid waste by comparing with evaporation and discharge (EASEWASTE)

机译:与蒸发和排放相比,城市生活垃圾填埋场中渗滤液再循环的环境影响评估(EASEWASTE)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In some arid regions where landfill produces minimal amount of leachate, leachate recirculation is suggested as a cost-effective option. However, its long-term impacts to environment remain disputed. For the purpose of revealing the environmental impacts of leachate recirculation in landfill, four scenarios were modeled using EASEWASTE, comparing the strategies of leachate recirculation (with or without gas management), evaporation and discharge. In the current situation (Scenario A), a total of 280 t of waste was generated and then transported to a conventional landfill for disposal. A number of contaminants derived from waste can be stored in the landfill for long periods, with 11.69 person equivalent (PE) for stored ecotoxicity in water and 29.62 PE for stored ecotoxicity in soil, considered as potential risks of releasing to the environment someday. Meanwhile, impacts to ecotoxicity and human toxicity in surface water, and those to groundwater, present relatively low levels. In Scenario B, leachate evaporation in a collecting pool has minimal impacts on surface water. However, this strategy significantly impacts groundwater (1055.16 PE) because of the potential infiltration of leachate, with major contaminants of As, ammonia, and Cd. A number of ions, such as Cl~-, Mg~(2+), and Ca~(2+), may also contaminate groundwater. In Scenario C, the direct discharge of leachate to surface water may result in acidification (2.71 PE) and nutrient enrichment (2.88 PE), primarily attributed to soluble ammonia in leachate and the depositional ammonia from biogas. Moreover, the direct discharge of leachate may also result in ecotoxicity and human toxicity via water contaminated by heavy metals in leachate, with 3.96 PE and 11.64 PE respectively. The results also show that landfill gas is the main contributor to global warming and photochemical ozone formation due to methane emission. In Scenario D, landfill gas flaring was thus be modeled and proven to be efficient for reducing impacts by approximately 90% in most categories, like global warming, photochemical ozone formation, acidification, nutrient enrichment, ecotoxicity, and human toxicity. Therefore, leachate recirculation is considered a cost-effective and environmentally viable solution for the current situation, and landfill gas treatment is urgently required. These results can provide important evidence for leachate and gas management of landfill in arid regions.
机译:在一些垃圾填埋场产生少量渗滤液的干旱地区,建议将渗滤液再循环是一种经济高效的选择。然而,其对环境的长期影响仍存在争议。为了揭示垃圾渗滤液再循环对环境的影响,使用EASEWASTE对四种情景进行了建模,比较了垃圾渗滤液再循环(采用或不采用气体管理),蒸发和排放的策略。在当前情况下(方案A),总共产生了280吨废物,然后被运到常规垃圾填埋场进行处置。废物产生的许多污染物可以长期保存在垃圾填埋场中,其中有11.69人当量(PE)的水中存储生态毒性和29.62个人当量(PE)的土壤中存储生态毒性,被认为有朝一日释放到环境中。同时,对地表水和地下水的生态毒性和人体毒性的影响相对较低。在方案B中,收集池中的渗滤液蒸发对地表水的影响最小。但是,由于渗滤液具有潜在的渗透性,且主要污染物为砷,氨和镉,因此该策略对地下水(1055.16 PE)产生了重大影响。许多离子,例如Cl〜-,Mg〜(2+)和Ca〜(2+),也可能污染地下水。在方案C中,渗滤液直接排放到地表水中可能导致酸化(2.71 PE)和养分富集(2.88 PE),这主要归因于渗滤液中的可溶性氨和沼气中的沉积氨。此外,渗滤液的直接排放还可能通过渗滤液中重金属污染的水(分别为3.96 PE和11.64 PE)导致生态毒性和人体毒性。结果还表明,垃圾填埋气是甲烷排放导致全球变暖和光化学臭氧形成的主要因素。因此,在方案D中,对垃圾填埋场的火炬燃烧进行了建模,并被证明可以有效地在大多数类别中将影响降低约90%,例如全球变暖,光化学臭氧形成,酸化,营养物质富集,生态毒性和人类毒性。因此,对于目前的情况,渗滤液的再循环被认为是一种具有成本效益和对环境有利的解决方案,因此迫切需要进行垃圾填埋气处理。这些结果可为干旱地区垃圾填埋场的渗滤液和瓦斯治理提供重要依据。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management》 |2013年第2期|382-389|共8页
  • 作者单位

    School of Environment, Tsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, China;

    School of Environment, Tsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, China;

    State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, 100875 Beijing, China;

    School of Environment, Tsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, China;

    Department of Science and Environmental Studies, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong;

    Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Life cycle assessment (LCA); Leachate recirculation; Evaporation; Toxicity; Groundwater; Arid region;

    机译:生命周期评估(LCA);渗滤液再循环;蒸发;毒性;地下水;干旱地区;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号