首页> 外文期刊>Waste Management >Leaching behaviour of incineration bottom ash in a reuse scenario: 12 years-field data vs. lab test results
【24h】

Leaching behaviour of incineration bottom ash in a reuse scenario: 12 years-field data vs. lab test results

机译:重复使用场景下焚烧炉底灰的浸出行为:12年现场数据与实验室测试结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Several types of standardized laboratory leaching tests have been developed during the past few decades to evaluate the leaching behaviour of waste materials as a function of different parameters, such as the pH of the eluate and the liquid to solid ratio. However, the link between the results of these tests and leaching data collected from the field (e.g. in disposal or reuse scenarios) is not always straightforward. In this work, we compare data obtained from an on-going large scale field trial, in which municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash is being tested as road sub-base material, with the results obtained from percolation column and pH-dependence laboratory leaching tests carried out on the bottom ash at the beginning of the test. The comparisons reported in this paper show that for soluble substances (e.g. Cl, K and SO4), percolation column tests can provide a good indication of the release expected in the field with deviations usually within a factor of 3. For metals characterized by a solubility-controlled release, i.e. that depends more on eluate pH than the liquid to solid ratio applied, the results of pH-dependence tests describe more accurately the eluate concentration trends observed in the field with deviations that in most cases (around 80%) are within one order of magnitude (see e.g. Al and Cd). The differences between field and lab-scale data might be in part ascribed to the occurrence in the field of weathering reactions (e.g. carbonation) but also to microbial decomposition of organic matter that modifying leachate pH affect the solubility of several constituents (e.g. Ca, Ba and Cr). Besides, weathering reactions can result in enhanced adsorption of fulvic acids to iron/aluminum (hydr)oxides, leading to a decrease in the leaching of fulvic acids and hence of elements such as Cu, Ni and Pb that strongly depend on DOC leaching. Overall, this comparison shows that percolation column tests and pH-dependence tests can represent a reliable screening tool to derive data that could be employed in risk-based analysis or life cycle assessment (LCA) frameworks for evaluating potential environmental impacts deriving from specific disposal/reuse options for waste materials.
机译:在过去的几十年中,已经开发了几种类型的标准化实验室浸出测试,以评估废料的浸出行为,这些浸出行为是不同参数的函数,例如洗脱液的pH值和液固比。但是,这些测试的结果与从现场收集的浸出数据之间的联系(例如,在处置或重复使用的情况下)并不总是那么简单。在这项工作中,我们将正在进行的大规模田间试验的数据进行比较,在该试验中,对城市固体垃圾焚烧底灰作为路基材料进行了测试,并从渗滤塔和pH依赖性实验室浸出测试中获得了结果。在测试开始时在底灰上进行。本文报道的比较结果表明,对于可溶性物质(例如Cl,K和SO4),渗滤柱测试可以很好地表明油田中预期的释放,偏差通常在3倍之内。对于以溶解度为特征的金属控释,即取决于洗脱液pH值而不是施加的液固比,pH依赖性测试的结果更准确地描述了在现场观察到的洗脱液浓度趋势,在大多数情况下(约80%)在一个数量级(例如参见Al和Cd)。现场数据和实验室规模数据之间的差异可能部分归因于风化反应领域(例如碳酸化)的发生,还归因于有机物的微生物分解,这改变了渗滤液的pH值,从而影响了几种成分(例如Ca,Ba和Cr)。此外,风化反应可导致黄腐酸对铁/铝(氢氧化)氧化物的吸附增强,导致黄腐酸的浸出减少,从而减少了强烈依赖DOC浸出的元素如Cu,Ni和Pb。总体而言,这种比较表明,渗滤柱测试和pH依赖性测试可以代表一种可靠的筛选工具,可以导出可用于基于风险的分析或生命周期评估(LCA)框架中的数据,以评估特定处置/产生的潜在环境影响。废物再利用的选择。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste Management》 |2018年第3期|367-380|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”;

    Danish Waste Solutions ApS;

    Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”;

    Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”;

    Danish Waste Solutions ApS;

    Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Leaching behaviour; Laboratory leaching tests; Field tests; Bottom ash;

    机译:浸出行为;实验室浸出试验;现场试验;底灰;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:35:19

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号