首页> 外文期刊>Waste management & research >Comparision of two different ways of landfill gas utilization through greenhouse gas emission reductions analysis and financial analysis
【24h】

Comparision of two different ways of landfill gas utilization through greenhouse gas emission reductions analysis and financial analysis

机译:通过减少温室气体排放量分析和财务分析比较两种不同的垃圾填埋气利用方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions and utilization of landfill gas (LFG) were researched by comparing LFG displacing the use of natural gas (scenario 2) with electricity generation using LFG (scenario 3) at three different LFG collecting efficiencies; 35, 50 and 65%. The results show that the utilization of LFG in scenario 2 is 1.4 times that in scenario 3. GHG emission reductions generated by scenario 2 are slightly less than that of scenario 3. The GHG emission reductions and utilization of LFG are restricted by LFG collecting efficiencies. It will be helpful to improve the management level of landfill and the GHG emissions reduction by introducing the CDM. However, the utilization of LFG will be still short of financial attractiveness if the LFG collection efficiency is less than 50%.
机译:通过比较在三种不同的LFG收集效率下LFG替代天然气的使用(方案2)与LFG的发电(方案3),研究了温室气体(GHG)排放量的减少和垃圾填埋气(LFG)的利用。 35、50和65%。结果表明,方案2的LFG利用率是方案3的1.4倍。方案2产生的温室气体减排量略小于方案3的温室气体减排量。LFG的收集效率限制了温室气体的排放量和利用率。引入清洁发展机制将有助于提高垃圾填埋场的管理水平和减少温室气体排放。但是,如果LFG收集效率低于50%,则LFG的利用仍将缺乏财务吸引力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号