首页> 外文期刊>Waste management & research >Residual household waste: from pay-per-bag to pay-per-kilogram. An evaluation study for Flanders
【24h】

Residual household waste: from pay-per-bag to pay-per-kilogram. An evaluation study for Flanders

机译:残余的家庭垃圾:从按袋子付费到按千克付费。法兰德斯的评估研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To be in line with the polluter-pays principle, an increasing number of Flemish municipalities have introduced a weight-based pricing system for residual household waste. Municipalities using this new pricing scheme are keen to ascribe decreasing waste production to the introduction of the new system. In order to evaluate the real impact of the weight-based pricing, an extension to the standard difference-in-differences evaluation techniques is proposed. The main idea is to use historical observations on waste production to determine which version of the difference-in-differences technique is most suitable to assess the impact of a policy action on waste quantities. The method is easy to apply, which makes it a very useful tool for both scientists and policy makers. Surprisingly, empirical results for Flanders indicate that, on average, municipalities using the weight-based system do not perform better than other municipalities.
机译:为了符合污染者付费原则,越来越多的佛兰德市政当局引入了基于权重的剩余家庭废物定价系统。使用这种新定价方案的市政部门渴望将减少废物产生归因于新系统的引入。为了评估基于权重的定价的实际影响,提出了对标准差异差异评估技术的扩展。主要思想是利用对废物生产的历史观察来确定哪种差异差异技术最适合评估政策措施对废物数量的影响。该方法易于应用,这使其成为科学家和政策制定者非常有用的工具。令人惊讶的是,法兰德斯的实证结果表明,平均而言,使用权重制的城市表现不比其他城市更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号