首页> 外文期刊>Waste management & research >Influence of semi-aerobic and anaerobic landfill operation with leachate recirculation on stabilization processes
【24h】

Influence of semi-aerobic and anaerobic landfill operation with leachate recirculation on stabilization processes

机译:渗滤液再循环的半好氧和厌氧垃圾填埋场操作对稳定过程的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To investigate the influence of semi-aerobic and anaerobic landfill operation on stabilization processes of landfill sites with leachate recirculation, in situ simulated semi-aerobic landfill sites with leachate recirculation (SLR) and anaerobic landfill sites with leachate recirculation (ALR) were constructed. Refuse properties and landfill settlement were determined. Leachate quality and landfill gas compositions were monitored regularly. Based on the data obtained, leachate quality, landfill gas and final refuse characteristics were adopted as assessment factors to quantitatively evaluate stabilization of landfill sites. The results showed that volatile solids (VS), total organic carbon (TOC) and biologically degradable matter (BDM) of aged refuse in SLR (15.8, 7.3 and 9.9%, respectively) were lower than those in ALR, which were 19.1, 9.2 and 11.3%, respectively. Settlement and reduction ratio of SLR were 1.71 m and 30.91%, respectively, and 1.40m and 25.45% in the case of ALR. Concentrations of organic pollutants, especially ammonia, were reduced in SLR, and variation in leachate quality was also smoother than ALR. Throughout the experiment the average concentration of CH_4 in ALR was higher than that in SLR (36.7 and 14.5%, respectively). At the end of the experiment, SLR was moderately stable, while ALR was moderately unstable. The comprehensive assessment index (I) for SLR and ALR was 200 and 355, respectively.
机译:为了研究半好氧和厌氧垃圾填埋场操作对渗滤液再循环垃圾填埋场稳定过程的影响,构建了原地模拟的渗滤液再循环半好氧垃圾填埋场(SLR)和渗滤液再循环的厌氧垃圾填埋场(ALR)。确定了垃圾性质和垃圾填埋场。定期监测渗滤液质量和垃圾填埋气成分。根据获得的数据,采用渗滤液质量,垃圾填埋气和最终垃圾特征作为评估因子,以定量评估垃圾填埋场的稳定性。结果表明,SLR中老化垃圾的挥发性固体(VS),总有机碳(TOC)和可生物降解物质(BDM)分别低于ALR的19.1、9.2和15.9,分别为7.3%和9.9%。和11.3%。 SLR的沉降率和减小率分别为1.71 m和30.91%,ALR的沉降率和减小率分别为1.40 m和25.45%。 SLR降低了有机污染物(尤其是氨)的浓度,渗滤液质量的变化也比ALR平滑。在整个实验中,ALR中CH_4的平均浓度高于SLR中的CH_4(分别为36.7和14.5%)。在实验结束时,SLR为中等稳定,而ALR为中等不稳定。 SLR和ALR的综合评估指数(I)分别为200和355。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste management & research》 |2012年第3期|p.255-265|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Research Institute of Solid Waste Management, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China,Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Jiangxi Ganzhou, China Quzhou University, Zhejiang Quzhou, China;

    Research Institute of Solid Waste Management, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China;

    Research Institute of Solid Waste Management, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China;

    Research Institute of Solid Waste Management, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China, 8, Dayangfang Anwai, Beijing 100012, China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    landfill operation; semi-aerobic landfill; leachate recirculation; stabilization evaluation; refuse;

    机译:堆填区运作;半好氧垃圾填埋场;渗滤液再循环;稳定性评估;垃圾;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号