首页> 外文期刊>Waste management & research >Quantitative performance targets by using balanced scorecard system: Application to waste management and public administration
【24h】

Quantitative performance targets by using balanced scorecard system: Application to waste management and public administration

机译:使用平衡计分卡系统的量化绩效目标:在废物管理和公共管理中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article demonstrates how decision-makers can be guided in the process of defining performance target values in the balanced scorecard system. We apply a method based on sensitivity analysis with Monte Carlo simulation to the municipal solid waste management system in Louie Municipality (Portugal). The method includes two steps: sensitivity analysis of performance indicators to identify those performance indicators with the highest impact on the balanced scorecard model outcomes; and sensitivity analysis of the target values for the previously identified performance indicators. Sensitivity analysis shows that four strategic objectives (IPP1: Comply with the national waste strategy; IPP4: Reduce nonrenewable resources and greenhouse gases; IPP5: Optimize the life-cycle of waste; and FP1: Meet and optimize the budget) alone contribute 99.7% of the variability in overall balanced scorecard value. Thus, these strategic objectives had a much stronger impact on the estimated balanced scorecard outcome than did others, with the IPP1 and the IPP4 accounting for over 55% and 22% of the variance in overall balanced scorecard value, respectively. The remaining performance indicators contribute only marginally. In addition, a change in the value of a single indicator's target value made the overall balanced scorecard value change by as much as 18%. This may lead to involuntarily biased decisions by organizations regarding performance target-setting, if not prevented with the help of methods such as that proposed and applied in this study.
机译:本文演示了如何在平衡计分卡系统中定义绩效目标值的过程中指导决策者。我们将基于蒙特卡罗模拟的敏感性分析方法应用于路易市(葡萄牙)的城市固体废物管理系统。该方法包括两个步骤:对绩效指标进行敏感性分析,以识别对平衡计分卡模型结果影响最大的绩效指标;对先前确定的绩效指标的目标值进行敏感性分析。敏感性分析显示,四个战略目标(IPP1:符合国家废物战略; IPP4:减少不可再生资源和温室气体; IPP5:优化废物的生命周期; FP1:满足并优化预算)仅占99.7%总体平衡计分卡值的变异性。因此,这些战略目标对估计的平衡计分卡结果的影响比其他战略目标要大得多,IPP1和IPP4分别占总体平衡计分卡价值差异的55%和22%以上。其余的绩效指标仅贡献很小。此外,单个指标目标值的变化使整体平衡计分卡值变化多达18%。如果不能借助本研究中建议和应用的方法来阻止,这可能会导致组织在绩效目标设定方面做出非自愿的偏见。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Waste management & research》 |2014年第9期|927-936|共10页
  • 作者单位

    CENSE - Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research,Lisbon, Portugal ,Loule City Hall, Louie, Portugal;

    CEris - Civil Engineering Research and Innovation for Sustainability, Lisbon, Portugal ,Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Algarve, Faro,Portugal;

    CENSE - Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research,Lisbon, Portugal Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Algarve, Faro,Portugal CENSE - Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research, and Faculty of Sciences and Technology,University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, Building 7,8005-139 Faro, Portugal;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Balanced scorecard; Monte Carlo; municipal waste; performance indicators; targets;

    机译:平衡计分卡;蒙特卡洛;城市垃圾;性能指标;目标;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:40:02

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号