...
首页> 外文期刊>Wall street & technology >So Much for Fragmentation
【24h】

So Much for Fragmentation

机译:碎片化非常重要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With the merger of Archipelago and the NYSE and the acquisition of Instinet (Inet) by Nasdaq, the overcrowded ECN field of five years ago suddenly looks smaller. Much smaller. With the disappearance of Inet and Area, the field of seven to 10 ECNs circa 1999 is down to only Bloomberg's TradeBook and a number of much smaller entities (e.g., Track, Attain, Nextrade, etc.) that today have little impact. So much for fragmentation. But what will this mean for the markets? And is the era of intermarket competition dead? There are two schools of market theory: order competition versus intermarket competition. Order competition assumes a centralized exchange predicated on orders meeting in a centralized environment aggressively competing for best price. The intermarket competition theory assumes multiple exchanges competing with each other and offering order flow incentives to attract liquidity.
机译:随着群岛和纽约证券交易所的合并以及纳斯达克对Instinet(Inet)的收购,五年前人满为患的ECN领域突然变小了。小多了。随着Inet和Area的消失,大约在1999年拥有7到10个ECN的领域仅限于彭博的TradeBook和今天影响不大的许多规模较小的实体(例如Track,Attain,Nextrade等)。碎片太多了。但这对市场意味着什么?市场间竞争的时代是否已死?市场理论有两种流派:订单竞争与市场间竞争。订单竞争假设一个集中交易基于在集中环境中积极满足最佳价格的订单会议。市场间竞争理论假设多个交易所相互竞争,并提供订单流动激励以吸引流动性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号