首页> 外文期刊>Vadose Zone Journal >Soil Profile Water Content Determination: Spatiotemporal Variability of Electromagnetic and Neutron Probe Sensors in Access Tubes
【24h】

Soil Profile Water Content Determination: Spatiotemporal Variability of Electromagnetic and Neutron Probe Sensors in Access Tubes

机译:土壤剖面水分含量测定:接入管中电磁和中子探针传感器的时空变异性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Since the late 1980s, electromagnetic (EM) sensors for determination of soil water content from within nonmetallic access tubes have been marketed as replacements for the neutron moisture meter (NMM); however, the accuracy, variability and physical significance of EM sensor field measurements have been questioned. We studied the accuracy and variability of four EM sensors and the NMM, compared with gravimetric measurements, in transects of 10 to 20 access tubes during three field seasons, using soil-specific calibrations. The three capacitance EM sensors produced water content readings for which SD values were up to an order of magnitude larger than those from the NMM. The EM sensor based on travel time (waveguide) principles produced SD values up to six times larger than those of the NMM or gravimetric sampling. The EM sensors would require from two to 72 times as many access tubes to obtain a mean profile water content to a given precision than would the NMM or gravimetric sampling, with more tubes required for drier conditions. The NMM exhibited spatial variation of similar magnitude and pattern as that of gravimetrically sampled profile water contents. The EM methods poorly reproduced the spatial and temporal behavior of NMM and gravimetric sampling and implied spatial variability of profile water content that was not evident in either the NMM or gravimetric data, even though EM sensing volumes were larger than the 75-cm3 volume of the gravimetric samples. We infer that EM sensors were influenced not only by the mean water content in the sampling volume but by the smaller scale structure of soil electrical properties.
机译:自1980年代后期以来,用于确定非金属进入管内土壤含水量的电磁(EM)传感器已作为中子水分计(NMM)的替代品上市销售;然而,人们对电磁传感器现场测量的准确性,可变性和物理意义提出了质疑。我们使用土壤特定的标定方法,在三个田间季节中,在重量为10到20的取水管横断面中,研究了四个重力感应器和NMM与重力测量相比的准确性和可变性。三个电容式EM传感器产生的水含量读数的SD值比NMM的高出一个数量级。基于行进时间(波导)原理的EM传感器产生的SD值比NMM或重量采样的SD值大六倍。与NMM或重量采样相比,EM传感器需要两倍至72倍的检修管才能获得给定精度的平均轮廓含水量,而在干燥条件下则需要更多的检修管。 NMM表现出的空间变化幅度和模式与重量法测量的剖面含水量相似。 EM方法不能很好地再现NMM和重量采样的空间和时间行为,并且暗示剖面含水量的空间变异性在NMM或重量数据中均不明显,即使EM感测体积大于容器的75 cm3体积。重量样品。我们推断,EM传感器不仅受采样体积中的平均水分含量的影响,还受到土壤电特性的较小尺度结构的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Vadose Zone Journal》 |2009年第4期|p.926-941|共16页
  • 作者单位

    USDA-ARS, Conservation & Production Research Lab., Soil and Water Management Research Unit, Bushland, TX 79012. The mention of trade names of commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号