...
首页> 外文期刊>Urban water journal >Analysis of chemicals and energy consumption in water and wastewater treatment, as cost components: Case study of Oslo, Norway
【24h】

Analysis of chemicals and energy consumption in water and wastewater treatment, as cost components: Case study of Oslo, Norway

机译:作为成本组成部分的水和废水处理中的化学药品和能源消耗分析:挪威奥斯陆案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Adopting a systems-approach to an urban water and vvastewater system, while applying a triple bottom line strategy to management, entails a careful analysis of ail the sub-systems and components thereof with a view to improving service levels, optimising expenditure, augmenting investments, and also reducing the life-cycle environmental impacts associated with setting up, maintaining and operating the system. The scope for optimising expenses is system-wide, though it varies from one sub-system to another, depending on inherent lock-ins and external factors beyond the direct control of the water and wastewater utility. Optimising the consumption of energy and chemicals and improving the cost-efficiency thereof, is always on the agenda of water treatment plants (WTPs) and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). This paper analyses the consumption of and the expenditure on chemicals and energy at Oslo's WTPs and WWTPs over time. Energy and chemicals for water and wastewater treatment, on an average account for !0.8% of the total operational expenses in the water supply sub-system and 13.7% for the wastewater handling sub-system. There is a perceptible increase in this share from 5.2% in 2004 to 14.9% in 2009 for water and 12.3% to 14.2% for wastewater. Chemicals cost more than energy for the WWTPs, while it was the other way round for the WTPs. The total real cost of energy and chemicals per cubic metre, in year-2007 currency, was between 4 and 5.2 Euro cents for the WTPs, and between 1 and 4.5 Euro cents for the WTPs. The total (WTP + WWTP) per-capita real costs of energy and chemicals, expressed in year-2007 currency, rose from around 10 Euros in year 2000 to about 12.2 Euros in year 2007.
机译:在采用城市供水和污水处理系统的系统方法的同时,将三重底线策略应用到管理中,需要仔细分析所有子系统及其组件,以改善服务水平,优化支出,增加投资,并减少与安装,维护和操作系统相关的生命周期环境影响。优化费用的范围是整个系统的,尽管它在一个子系统之间有所不同,这取决于水和废水处理厂直接控制之外的固有锁定和外部因素。在水处理厂(WTP)和废水处理厂(WWTP)中,优化能源和化学药品的消耗并提高其成本效率一直是人们的议事日程。本文分析了奥斯陆污水处理厂和污水处理厂随着时间的消耗和化学药品和能源的支出。用于水和废水处理的能源和化学品,平均占供水子系统总运营支出的!0.8%,占废水处理子系统总运营支出的13.7%。水的份额从2004年的5.2%增长到2009年的14.9%,废水的份额从12.3%增长到14.2%,这是可以察觉的。污水处理厂的化学品成本高于能源成本,而污水处理厂的成本则相反。每立方米能源和化学品的实际总成本(以2007年货币为单位)在WTP中为4到5.2欧分之间,在WTP中为1到4.5欧分之间。人均能源和化学物质的实际总成本(WTP + WWTP)以2007年货币表示,从2000年的约10欧元增加到2007年的约12.2欧元。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号