首页> 外文期刊>Urban Studies >Does slum formalisation without title provision stimulate housing improvement? A case of slum declaration in Pune, India
【24h】

Does slum formalisation without title provision stimulate housing improvement? A case of slum declaration in Pune, India

机译:没有产权规定的贫民窟形式化是否会刺激住房改善?印度浦那贫民窟宣告案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Though previous studies have examined how formalising land tenure affects housing improvements in informal settlements, the role of tenure security and its long-term influence remain unclear. In response, this paper quantitatively examines the extent to which formalising land tenure by way of slum declaration has stimulated housing improvements during the last three decades in the slums of Pune, India. Since slum declaration guarantees residents occupancy but not full property rights, this study focuses on how tenure security contributes to housing outcomes, such as materials, size, the number of floors and the amount of money spent for the improvements. Using original household survey data, analysis involving propensity score matching and difference-in-differences methods reveals that slum declaration has tripled a household's likelihood of having added a second floor and, albeit less clear, increased the average amount of money spent on housing improvements. At the same time, slum declaration has not induced any improvement in housing materials, largely since many residents of non-formalised slums have also replaced materials. These results indicate that slum declaration, even in the long run, has continued to influence housing investments in Pune's slums, in terms of both type and amount spent, though residents of non-formalised slums have also come to enjoy certain de facto tenure security. Among other implications for policy, these findings underscore that governments should at least provide legal assurance of occupancy rights in informal settlements, even if active interventions such as slum upgrading and titling are currently difficult.
机译:尽管先前的研究已经检查了土地保有权的正规化如何影响非正式住区的住房改善,但保有权保障的作用及其长期影响仍不清楚。作为回应,本文定量分析了通过贫民窟宣告的形式的土地保有权在过去三十年中刺激了印度浦那贫民窟的住房改善的程度。由于贫民窟的宣布可以保障居民的居住权,但不能保证其拥有完整的财产权,因此本研究着眼于权属保障如何促进住房成果,例如材料,面积,楼层数和用于改善的支出金额。使用原始的家庭调查数据,涉及倾向得分匹配和差异差异方法的分析表明,贫民窟的宣布使家庭增加二层住房的可能性增加了三倍,尽管不清楚,但增加了用于住房改善的平均费用。同时,贫民窟的宣告并没有引起住房材料的任何改善,主要是因为许多非正规贫民窟的居民也更换了材料。这些结果表明,尽管从长远来看,贫民窟的宣布在类型和支出上仍继续影响着浦那贫民窟的住房投资,尽管非正规贫民窟的居民也已经享有一定的事实上的土地保有权。这些对政策的影响除其他外,这些发现强调,即使目前很难进行诸如贫民窟改造和所有权分配等积极干预措施,政府也应至少为非正式住区的居住权提供法律保障。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号