首页> 外文期刊>Urban Studies >Keeping financialisation under the radar: Brussels Airport, Macquarie Bank and the Belgian politics of privatised infrastructure
【24h】

Keeping financialisation under the radar: Brussels Airport, Macquarie Bank and the Belgian politics of privatised infrastructure

机译:在雷达下保留金融化:布鲁塞尔机场,麦格理银行和比利时政治的私有化基础设施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article explores the financialisation of Brussels Airport following the acquisition in 2004 of a majority stake by the Australian Macquarie Bank. Adopting a variegated capitalism perspective, we argue for a greater sensitivity to the mutually constitutive relation between durable institutional governance structures and financialised practices injected by global investors. The case of Brussels Airport presents an informative case to examine this relation, as Macquarie has had to continuously interact with the Belgian federal state in its different guises of contractor, co-owner and regulator to implement financialisation. While Macquarie indeed brought in risks that are structurally associated with profit making through financial means, the governance of these practices is shaped by the Belgian state's distinctive and pragmatic approach to infrastructure privatisation: the state enables these practices, but also contests them in case of a direct clash with its interests. Meanwhile, the regulatory environment marks the contradictory meeting point of two varieties of capitalism: while the light-handed regulatory framework is inspired by the UK's airport industry, the Belgian regulator does not possess similar abilities as a UK regulator, and resultantly, informal negotiations between the stakeholders are more influential in the airport's governance. The case of Brussels Airport shows that the state plays an active role in constituting global capitalism, yet also shapes how financialisation works out on the ground. To understand the tensions that mark the governance of financialised infrastructure, it is therefore imperative to be sensitive to the local, historical and political trajectories that underwrite the variegated outcomes of financialisation.
机译:本文探讨了2004年澳大利亚麦格理银行的大多数股权收购后布鲁塞尔机场的经验。采用杂乱的资本主义观点,我们争论持久的制度治理结构与全球投资者注射的经费制度治理结构与经费实践之间的相互构成关系的敏感性。 Brussels机场的案例提出了一个信息案例来审查这一关系,因为麦格理不得不在其不同的承包商,共同主人和监管机构的不同委员会中与比利时联邦国务不断互动以实施商业化。虽然麦格理确实带来了通过财务意义的利润相关的风险,但这些做法的治理是由比利时国家对基础设施私有化的独特和务实的私有化方面的塑造:国家能够实现这些做法,但也可以在其中争夺他们直接冲突及其兴趣。同时,监管环境标志着两种资本主义的矛盾会议点:虽然光手监管框架受到英国机场行业的启发,但比利时监管机构没有与英国监管机构相似的能力,从而产生了非正式的谈判利益相关者在机场治理方面更具影响力。布鲁塞尔机场的案例表明,国家在构成全球资本主义方面发挥着积极的作用,尚未塑造经济如何在地面上锻炼。要了解标志着经费基础设施治理的紧张局势,因此必须对众所周知的历史和政治轨迹敏感,这些轨迹承担着众所周知的经济结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号